Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Red Community > Red Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old 09-02-2013, 01:27 PM
Vexenu Vexenu is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,183
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aenor [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
More evidence of why the Sullon Zek ruleset was retarded from the day it was conceived and why it was, by an order of magnitude, the least populated of the four PvP servers. Sirken said they're doing an experiment to see what will retain population. Race War retained population. Sullon did not. Case dismissed.
I don't think you know what the term "order of magnitude" means.

Hint: It's not a synonym for "a lot".

Also, SZ had very good pop numbers, especially considering most of its players were drawn from the existing PvP servers.
  #52  
Old 09-02-2013, 01:35 PM
nilbog nilbog is offline
Project Manager

nilbog's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 14,541
Default

google..

"sullon zek" "lowest population"

Or,

"everquest" "pvp servers" "population"
"everquest" "pvp servers" "how many people play"

"rallos" "vallon" "tallon" "zek"

After searching, you can click search tools, then modify 'any time' to 'custom range' from 'year A' to 'year B'
  #53  
Old 09-02-2013, 01:40 PM
nilbog nilbog is offline
Project Manager

nilbog's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 14,541
Default

Point being, you can't trust what people here say without quotes. Never do that.

For example from the top 4 or 5 matches:

Quote:
Sullon Zek probably had the lowest population of all servers. In fact, I'm certain it did. That was because of frequent griefing, a bad economy that lagged behind every other server, and there were no GM's. Nonetheless, I liked the atmosphere. But it's not practical for most users.
Quote:
Why would they make a new pvp server when the last one they made, Sullon Zek, has the lowest population and it was what people wanted at that time?
Quote:
At a guess, (I played on SZ when it opened and up until recently) I would say that the low population of SZ is due to 1. the difficulty of the server (it is a harsh server unless its changed a lot since I left), and 2. there are already so many glaring problems with pvp in EQ that all pvp servers in EQ have naturally low populations. SZ is just the lowest of the low because of the difficulty factor.
Quote:
The time the devs spent on BALANCING PvP could have been used to make the PVE better...and the 4 PvP servers were the lowest population servers. The Last one Sullon Zek, was the absolute lowest server population
  #54  
Old 09-02-2013, 01:46 PM
Rec Rec is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 633
Default

what year? I am trying to find actual numbers of people online before they put the pop books in which was on oct 2002

best I see is this

August '02
Good: 1485 - 33.2%
Neutral: 1201 - 26.9%
Evil: 1783 - 39.9%
Last edited by Rec; 09-02-2013 at 01:48 PM..
  #55  
Old 09-02-2013, 01:51 PM
Banai Banai is offline
Orc


Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 34
Default

Sullon Zek was a fucking shit server with shit people who circlejerked eachother with mechanic abuse and griefing, anyone with a few brain cells left would turn that shit down.. Griefing and harrassing people isnt PvP its just retarded
  #56  
Old 09-02-2013, 05:29 PM
Aenor Aenor is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 830
Default

I don't think you know what exaggeration is. Congrats on out-geeking me, however.
  #57  
Old 09-02-2013, 07:08 PM
Syft Syft is offline
Banned


Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 382
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Banai [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Sullon Zek was a fucking shit server with shit people who circlejerked eachother with mechanic abuse and griefing, anyone with a few brain cells left would turn that shit down.. Griefing and harrassing people isnt PvP its just retarded
Hell yea Vallon and Tallon was... wait sullon what you high?
  #58  
Old 09-02-2013, 07:28 PM
Vexenu Vexenu is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,183
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aenor [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I don't think you know what exaggeration is. Congrats on out-geeking me, however.
If you're trying to make a factual argument, you can't carelessly throw around a term that means "by a power of 10" and call it "exaggeration". Because that results in a much larger numerical difference than the word exaggeration would imply.

I mean, if you wanted to exaggerate your height, you wouldn't go around telling people you were 62 feet tall, would you?

So it's equally silly to claim that SZ had a 10x lower population than the other servers, because even if it was the lowest pop server, it was not nearly by that much.
  #59  
Old 09-02-2013, 11:03 PM
Aenor Aenor is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 830
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aenor [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I don't think you know what exaggeration is
<---- called it.
  #60  
Old 09-02-2013, 11:31 PM
Vexenu Vexenu is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,183
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aenor [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
More evidence of why the Sullon Zek ruleset was retarded from the day it was conceived and why it was, by an order of magnitude, the least populated of the four PvP servers. Sirken said they're doing an experiment to see what will retain population. Race War retained population. Sullon did not. Case dismissed.
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:45 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.