![]() |
|
#23
|
|||
|
I should clarify that i am not trying to throw Sloan under the bus here as i notice its almost what my whole post does. Sloan is not being totally unreasonable here, the DQ rule was a rule but it was retarded and was just a way for a cheap win for either side.
In Sloans defense it was kind lame to try and win the bet on a DQ. Even though the rule WAS broken, it was a shitty rule to begin with that made no sense and Sericx probably should have let it go, not to say he HAD to let it go but it would have been reasonable to let it go and continue and honor the bet form there on. The interference was an accident it was not malicious and could have simply been moved on from. If you wanted to be reasonable and fair with each other and use common sense and not be so prideful about winning or losing the logical and what i see as most fair thing under the situation where rules were so poorly made would have been to continue like we did and like i said Sericx should have paid up for dieing (This is what should have happened for the sake of being fair and reasonable IMO) If you followed the rules agreed upon, sericx should have had the opportunity to call it if he really wanted to at the DQ, but that was never really an option. In the end i feel everyone was wrong starting from the very start of not discussing the rules, just by that alone this was bound to happen, no ones truthfully right here, it could go either way, sloan could have paid sericx for a DQ and Sericx could have let it go and paid for dieing afterward but none of that happened. instead both sides argued every step of the way. | ||
|
|
|||
|
|