Class Thread/Board

[Dantes]

If nested sub-forums are possible, one for each class would be cool. Then we don't have this list of mostly inactive forums for classes that nobody talks about. Otherwise, if nested is not an option, archetypes would work just fine. I've been wanting to gather up all of the great Warrior info I have found here and post it in one place, both for myself to reference later and for new folks. Looking forward to it!

[davedeck42]

you wouldnt have to make one for rangers..

[ElanoraBryght]

So maybe what you can do is just start a thread for whatever it is you're so intereseted in. Then if it gets enough interest from the community (say, if people actually reply on a regular basis), then maybe the forum admins will sticky / create subsections. And if it doesn't get enough interest to be a viable area on its own, it can eventually fade away without having taken any valuable time / action on the admin side.

Edit - re-reading it made me think that sounded snarky, and I didn't mean it to. Just - start a thread. See if people have something to contribute.

Anyone want to start a shaman thread? ;0

[astuce999]

There's been enough of a flood of bard type posts in the recent couple days to at least warrant a forum section for us!

I really think the subforums should be (like I've posted before)

Melee (war, monk, rog)

Hybrid (pal, SK, ranger)

Priest (dru, clr, sham)

Caster (ench, mag, wiz, necro)

Bard (bard! bard!)



Cheers!

[oldhead]

Originally Posted by Lazortag [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Make a board for "Class Discussion" and have it separated into different sub-forums. The subforums should only appear after you click on class discussion. I hate clutter too so I think this is the best solution.

THIS

Originally Posted by astuce999 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

There's been enough of a flood of bard type posts in the recent couple days to at least warrant a forum section for us!

I really think the subforums should be (like I've posted before)

Melee (war, monk, rog)

Hybrid (pal, SK, ranger)

Priest (dru, clr, sham)

Caster (ench, mag, wiz, necro)

Bard (bard! bard!)


Cheers!

Not this...

Each class has specific features, gear, and functions. Each class needs its own subforums. Either do it right or dont do it. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Taluvill]

Originally Posted by oldhead [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

THIS


Not this...

Each class has specific features, gear, and functions. Each class needs its own subforums. Either do it right or dont do it. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Agreed 100%

[mjavor]

Class sub forums would be uber.

Get some sticky gear threads, leveling guides... woot.

Let's get this project started. =p

[Ardenya]

I think archtype based forums should be more than enough, as you can gather all class relevant information in a sticky whereas discussions about specific mechanics and the like can happen in its own thread. Just create tags like [Warrior], [Druid], [Enchanter], etc for people to put infront of the topic to label their discussions.

[Emoqq]

Results of a poll done on class distribution. Based on this alone, id say there would probably be enough activity in each class forum to support every class getting their own forum space.

This might also be a way to get more people using the forums, since I know lots of people hate R&F, and Server Chat is the only other major one people check out, this could provide another space for people to discuss things.

27 Bard 6.40%
37 Cleric 8.77%
44 Druid 10.43%
32 Enchanter 7.58%
37 Magician 8.77%
26 Monk 6.16%
33 Necromancer 7.82%
26 Paladin 6.16%
14 Ranger 3.32%
23 Rogue 5.45%
27 Shadow Knight 6.40%
47 Shaman 11.14%
23 Warrior 6.16%
23 Wizard 5.45%

422 votes

[oldhead]

I miss monkly-business.net... safehouse not so much.

I know they are still up but they dont talk about the same game.