#171
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#172
|
|||
|
all this policy promotes is confusion and leagues of alts waiting in the wings. lns was implemented with vague wording rather than approaching it from the programming side and forcing effects on people(like a res effect) and the confusion over rules and heavy handed one sided punishments have left this server in shambles. re wording the policy is just a band-aid solution and is still going to leave gms with 1000 petitions a week and players with a poor impression of the server. try telling a returning or new player about these rules and see how long they stay.
| ||
|
#173
|
||||
|
Quote:
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.][You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.][You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.][You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.][You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.][You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
__________________
Checkraise Dragonslayer <Retired>
"My armor color matches my playstyle" | |||
|
#174
|
|||
|
Must have got a BCG eh?
| ||
|
#175
|
||||
|
Quote:
Red Dawn violation #1 Ressing 20 players during the Solb/Lavastorm fight. The one were Tune/Spectre were banned. Red Dawn violation #2 Denied LNS to shipit. One red dawn enchanter ran back 3 times tashing, dispelling people during the DL/Gore fight. I am not saying there has not been violations on each side. But acting like Red Dawn has no violations is laughable. | |||
Last edited by Kontra; 01-20-2014 at 10:57 AM..
|
|
#176
|
|||
|
encanter
lavasotmr
__________________
Checkraise Dragonslayer <Retired>
"My armor color matches my playstyle" | ||
|
#177
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Ruban Poodlehumper
Cleric of Ak'anon also Chmel - druid, Lupulus - rogue, Hraesvaelg - warrior & Vidar - paladin. | |||
|
#178
|
|||
|
I wanted to comment on the RnF that has been going on in this thread. Many RD (k9quaint) have mentioned how good the zoning lns is because "Nizzar will never call LNs" while at the same time stating that all Nilly is fighting for there own agenda... If he did not call LNS for his dead what is te problem with sitting on Nilly corpses?
It seems to me that being able to kill one person and have everyone else zone is a huge point for RD as nihilum has had many small forces fight gainst a RD Zerg at KC zone line, untill reserves come. With this rule Nihilum would basically have to sit in DL doing nothing untill they had a force large enough for one single push. After that push one winning team would be crowned. If that is what the CSR is looking for then disregard what I have said as I think it will work. What it will hurt is pvp in general as rather than plunking into kc dropping a few people and fighting for control over a period of time( haven't seen it take more than 30 mins to and hour myself) people must just wait for there own Zerg before they can logically engage. Point 6 of guild a zone into 10 of guild B in KC. Guild a gets one YT, guild b gets one YT. Guild a zones out due to numbers... They are now on LNS for one hour due to one YT that could potentially happen instantly on a caster zoning into a rogue waiting. Tl;dr I LOVE gongs how's idea
__________________
| ||
Last edited by Ryko; 01-20-2014 at 10:55 AM..
Reason: iPhone autocorrect
|
|
#180
|
|||
|
My only contribution to this subject. Players who flop aka cry ban should be suspended if no actual infraction has yet to take place. Any cry bans in ooc should result in player being suspended for one month.
| ||
|
|
|