Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 02-08-2014, 01:47 PM
radditsu radditsu is offline
Planar Protector

radditsu's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,351
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Swish [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Like log in remotely to his "dad's work PC" from home and buff from there? Mhm.
Only good remote software that will render 3d is the chrome remote app...that I have seen.
__________________

Tanrin,Rinat,Sprucewaynee
  #32  
Old 02-08-2014, 01:57 PM
Derubael Derubael is offline
Retired GM


Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Cabilis East, in the northwest corner of the zone-in from Field of Bone
Posts: 5,009
Default

Going to be honest here.

Yes, this would probably raise red flags. Is there anything wrong with what you're asking to do? No, as long as you are never controlling that cleric, this isn't two boxing, and you aren't going to get in trouble.

Be aware, however, that we will often run two-box tests when people don't even know we are around or manipulating the situation to get a desired result. It's pretty obvious when its one person controlling two characters. If I were 'investigating' your two box, I would wait until your 'dad' moved, do a test without you even realizing it was happening, and then nail you if you failed.

tl;dr We don't punish innocent people. If you are twoboxing, we will know. Keep your hands off that second character [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #33  
Old 02-08-2014, 02:00 PM
Kazi Kazi is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 199
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Derubael [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Going to be honest here.

Yes, this would probably raise red flags. Is there anything wrong with what you're asking to do? No, as long as you are never controlling that cleric, this isn't two boxing, and you aren't going to get in trouble.

Be aware, however, that we will often run two-box tests when people don't even know we are around or manipulating the situation to get a desired result. It's pretty obvious when its one person controlling two characters. If I were 'investigating' your two box, I would wait until your 'dad' moved, do a test without you even realizing it was happening, and then nail you if you failed.

tl;dr We don't punish innocent people. If you are twoboxing, we will know. Keep your hands off that second character [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
That's pretty boss.
  #34  
Old 02-08-2014, 02:37 PM
imajester imajester is offline
Orc


Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 31
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Derubael [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Going to be honest here.

Yes, this would probably raise red flags. Is there anything wrong with what you're asking to do? No, as long as you are never controlling that cleric, this isn't two boxing, and you aren't going to get in trouble.

Be aware, however, that we will often run two-box tests when people don't even know we are around or manipulating the situation to get a desired result. It's pretty obvious when its one person controlling two characters. If I were 'investigating' your two box, I would wait until your 'dad' moved, do a test without you even realizing it was happening, and then nail you if you failed.

tl;dr We don't punish innocent people. If you are twoboxing, we will know. Keep your hands off that second character [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Got to admit, I love that response.
  #35  
Old 02-08-2014, 03:17 PM
Champion_Standing Champion_Standing is offline
Planar Protector

Champion_Standing's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,127
Default

This is such a believable story that this guy should get a free pass to box as much as he wants, go ahead Dad, log in and have some fun!
  #36  
Old 02-09-2014, 01:37 PM
twizztid twizztid is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 157
Default

I have heard that if GM's suspect you of boxing ( and they feel quite confident ) they will port the 2 accused characters to an obsticle course where they are to run it simultaniously... this is by word tho, not sure.
  #37  
Old 02-09-2014, 01:44 PM
fastboy21 fastboy21 is offline
Planar Protector

fastboy21's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,179
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by twizztid [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I have heard that if GM's suspect you of boxing ( and they feel quite confident ) they will port the 2 accused characters to an obsticle course where they are to run it simultaniously... this is by word tho, not sure.
thats pretty awesome. if you can do this as a two boxer, imo you deserve to be allowed to continue two boxing.

i played with a chanter last night that would prob fail to get through any course just 1-boxing...he should be banned as well.
  #38  
Old 02-09-2014, 02:44 PM
Dakidd4990 Dakidd4990 is offline
Banned


Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 42
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Derubael [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Going to be honest here.

Yes, this would probably raise red flags. Is there anything wrong with what you're asking to do? No, as long as you are never controlling that cleric, this isn't two boxing, and you aren't going to get in trouble.

Be aware, however, that we will often run two-box tests when people don't even know we are around or manipulating the situation to get a desired result. It's pretty obvious when its one person controlling two characters. If I were 'investigating' your two box, I would wait until your 'dad' moved, do a test without you even realizing it was happening, and then nail you if you failed.

tl;dr We don't punish innocent people. If you are twoboxing, we will know. Keep your hands off that second character [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Thanks for the response Derubael [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] I fully understand how suspicious it looks/sounds so I'm just gonna not bother with it. Not worth all the hassle. I'll just wait til he's not working and has time to actually play [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #39  
Old 02-10-2014, 08:26 AM
Sgt1stClassPerkerwood Sgt1stClassPerkerwood is offline
Kobold


Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 188
Default

Lol gm comes out and says 'don't worry, only 2boxxers get banned BC its easily testable'. Then OP says 'nah I don't want to look like a boxxer. Have a good one'.

Another 2boxxer thwarted.
__________________
======================================
  #40  
Old 02-10-2014, 08:33 AM
Clark Clark is offline
Planar Protector

Clark's Avatar

Join Date: May 2012
Location: Metropolis
Posts: 5,148
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dumesh Uhl'Belk [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Assuming you are legit for the sake of the discussion...

Your dad needs to camp out when not buffing you. He can alt tab from his spreadsheets to log back in when you need your rebuffs. Doing it with the regular AFKs will eventually get you banned.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:21 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.