Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Raid Discussion

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #141  
Old 06-06-2014, 10:51 AM
Erati Erati is offline
Planar Protector

Erati's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,561
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by phiren [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I'd prefer to throw it up to a C/FFA/R rotation like everything else. Putting it up on C / FFA / R gives every guild an incentive to leave the other mobs up to get through the cycle quicker.

The 'your sky day' is just not clear enough for a couple reasons:
#1) Saturday / Sunday / Monday are double days
#2) Other Class R Guilds that do not have Sky days might want to get in on this

I just don't see what the trouble is with FFA / C / R ... other than stirring up the entire debate AGAIN as to whether FFA / C / R is the right thing to be doing in the first place.

Noble gives an FTE shout (he did a month or so ago)... clearly the GMs saw this is an important "Raid Mob".. so why not count it as a Raid Mob like the other Raid Mobs?

~Phiren
Azure Guard
necroing this response...well said Phiren

QFT
  #142  
Old 06-06-2014, 11:30 AM
bktroost bktroost is offline
Planar Protector

bktroost's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,211
Default

That would mean we would need lockouts as well... I think 2 months of dedication to make this "experiment" work should be enough to show you, Deru and Sirken and Rogean, that we DO care enough about this mob and the drops he has to give it attention. I know Velious is like priority #1 in every regard, but some of the quest items in sky are extremely good even in Velious era. This HAS to be given some attention.


Until that time comes, let me see if we can get some clarity on what to do about the immediate.

TMO instigated an aggressive move against IB. IB retaliated and Taken seized an opportunity. If we can suppose for a moment that the agreement is still standing then these 3 guilds violated that--regardless of their reasoning.

The immediate solution is to say "If IB, TMO and Taken all agree to NOT kill OOAs unanimously then we will be back on track," at least until we get word from Sirken. This is our own option as of right now and it benefits everyone.

Can we agree to this small patch while we actively work to make things better in a permanent way?
__________________
  #143  
Old 06-06-2014, 11:37 AM
-Catherin- -Catherin- is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,508
Default

Taken can't be in violation of an agreement that is not longer an agreement. If we know that other Guilds are going to kill the overseers and ruin it for everyone else for their own benefit, then we are not going to just sit and watch it happen.

I am personally not inclined to go back to how it was, because how it was didn't work. It will very well end up the same way. Spawn multiple overseers, couple guilds feel snubbed for one reason or another and retaliates by killing them.

Like I said, back to the drawing board.
  #144  
Old 06-06-2014, 11:39 AM
Splorf22 Splorf22 is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,237
Default

Simply put, there is no stick here. Taken, IB, and TMO have proven that they don't mind sitting on the spawn point spamming for FTE. And Noble is not on variance, so its not nearly as bad as most.

Meanwhile the carrot has not really materialized, and that's what has me so sad about this whole business. We were about to get 3+ OOAs up which is when we would really start to flood the server with nobles.
__________________
Raev | Loraen | Sakuragi <The A-Team> | Solo Artist Challenge | Farmer's Market
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arteker
in words of anal fingers, just a filthy spaniard
Last edited by Splorf22; 06-06-2014 at 11:44 AM..
  #145  
Old 06-06-2014, 11:40 AM
bktroost bktroost is offline
Planar Protector

bktroost's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,211
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bktroost [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
If we can suppose for a moment that the agreement is still standing
There was a presupposition. Obviously it is not still in effect or we'd have Nobles.
__________________
  #146  
Old 06-06-2014, 11:42 AM
bktroost bktroost is offline
Planar Protector

bktroost's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,211
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by -Catherin- [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I am personally not inclined to go back to how it was, because how it was didn't work.

Like I said, back to the drawing board.
I agree and disagree. It did work better than FTEing clickfest. I'd like to try to keep the OOAs going for now while we campaign to get some results from Rogean/Sirken.
__________________
  #147  
Old 06-06-2014, 11:43 AM
-Catherin- -Catherin- is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,508
Default

I think one of the things that needs to happen before we can get back to this is that every guild needs to share in this equally. we had several guilds rotating spawns but then several other guilds that would not take part and only kill nobles on their day, and other guilds days as well.

if everyone shared equally in the rotation, then they would share equally in the fallout should someone decide to kill the overseers again. This would discourage them from doing so themselves if they actually shared in the collateral with the rest of us that were trying to rotate them.
  #148  
Old 06-06-2014, 11:45 AM
arsenalpow arsenalpow is offline
Planar Protector

arsenalpow's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,225
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by -Catherin- [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I think one of the things that needs to happen before we can get back to this is that every guild needs to share in this equally. we had several guilds rotating spawns but then several other guilds that would not take part and only kill nobles on their day, and other guilds days as well.

if everyone shared equally in the rotation, then they would share equally in the fallout should someone decide to kill the overseers again. This would discourage them from doing so themselves if they actually shared in the collateral with the rest of us that were trying to rotate them.
Because sharing everything else on the server has worked our so well.
__________________
Monk of Bregan D'Aerth
Wielder of the Celestial Fists
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hollywood Hogan
The first thing you gotta' realize, brother, is this right here is the future of wrestling. You can call this the New World Order of Wrestling.
  #149  
Old 06-06-2014, 11:48 AM
-Catherin- -Catherin- is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,508
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by arsenalpow [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Because sharing everything else on the server has worked our so well.
I know its probably a pipe dream Chest. Just stating what probably would need to happen if there is to be any real hope of this working.

Im not holding my breath on the C/R/FFA thing
  #150  
Old 06-06-2014, 12:04 PM
arsenalpow arsenalpow is offline
Planar Protector

arsenalpow's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,225
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by -Catherin- [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I know its probably a pipe dream Chest. Just stating what probably would need to happen if there is to be any real hope of this working.

Im not holding my breath on the C/R/FFA thing
It's absolutely a pipe dream. Unless there's an enforceable policy there never going to be anything to stop a defector from smashing any player made agreement to bits.
__________________
Monk of Bregan D'Aerth
Wielder of the Celestial Fists
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hollywood Hogan
The first thing you gotta' realize, brother, is this right here is the future of wrestling. You can call this the New World Order of Wrestling.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:07 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.