Police Officers

[guineapig]

Originally Posted by Tiggles [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

w because liberal and racist minorities will lie and only tell one side of the story to try and discredit anything they perceive as conservative.

wha?


Show me a 2 faction system on Earth where the one faction does not try to discredit the other faction.

And what the hell does racist minority mean?
Are other forms of bigotry okay though?

[purist]

I don't think we really need to ask why, we are talking about a guy who gets his political education from 4chan Janeane Garofalo memes. Either we've just been trolled or he is actually a retard.

[Bojangles]

Guineapig:
"Show me a 2 faction system on Earth where the one faction does not try to discredit the other faction."

The problem is that side #1 supports law and order. You know, the shit that keeps a society running. When side #2 opposes that merely because side #1 supports it, then side #2 is no longer a valid political group it is a revolt that needs to be exterminated.

[purist]

Bojangles your political opinions are about as substantial as the Taco Bell fart I just unleashed.

[azeth]

think outside the bun

[Murphy]

You'll only hear the word "liberals" out of the mouth of a white man

[Tiggles]

When impartial forensic pathologists looked at the physical evidence they cast doubt on Puroll's version of events, not confirmed it.

`The article that is critical of the investigation was written by a reporter who was able to solicit opinions of those with differing views,'' the statement said. ``After a review all of the evidence in this case, the Pinal County Sheriff's Office has closed this criminal investigation and concluded that it occurred as Deputy Puroll reported it.''

And what the hell does racist minority mean?
Are other forms of bigotry okay though?

Yes, White power

The problem is that side #1 supports law and order. You know, the shit that keeps a society running. When side #2 opposes that merely because side #1 supports it, then side #2 is no longer a valid political group it is a revolt that needs to be exterminated.

This! too bad the Zionist controlled media tries to undermine our country for their personal gain

[Kassel]

The problem is that side #1 supports law and order. You know, the shit that keeps a society running. When side #2 opposes that merely because side #1 supports it, then side #2 is no longer a valid political group it is a revolt that needs to be exterminated.

#1) King of England

#2) George Washington

hmm

[SlankyLanky]

Originally Posted by purist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Good band.

gooder band indeed.

[Bojangles]

Originally Posted by purist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Bojangles your political opinions are about as substantial as the Taco Bell fart I just unleashed.

Typical liberal hypocrisy. You castigate me for not being substantial enough... in a post with 1 sentence. Care to elaborate on your arguments and counter-arguments in a substantial way? Please note: "TL;DR" is not considered 'substantial' for this purpose.

Originally Posted by Murphy [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You'll only hear the word "liberals" out of the mouth of a white man

Do you say this because you think blacks pronounce it "libral"? Or are you saying that blacks aren't educated enough to know about the names for either end of the political spectrum, whose terms are often used as a simplified way of... Wait, I really don't get what you are saying. Please explain, preferably in a 'substantial' way to keep Purist happy. Also, why do you think white women would not use the word liberal?

Btw, did you put any thought whatsoever into what you just wrote? Because it can easily be disproven by even the most rudimentary of google searches, not to mention practical experience. You do talk to people who are not white males, right?

Originally Posted by Kassel [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

#1) King of England

#2) George Washington

hmm

Your historical knowledge of this country is about equal to your knowledge of politics.

GW and the colonists did not advocate the marginalization of the forces of law and order. GW et al did not advocate hating and distrusting people who had served their country in the military. GW et al did advocate a new way for a people and their government to relate to each other.

If the dems were simply doing this, then fine. Let the voters decide. But that is not what this debate is about. It is about 1 group of people who hate the forces of law and order simply because those forces tend to be associated with a 2nd group.