+/- 4 levels is too restrictive

[Swyft]

Originally Posted by Bazia [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

wizard hard pvp class ur right

I can name more Wizards that never got a single kill till epic'd then ones who slayed pre 60. Truth is most of the players here blue as fawk and couldn't pvp worth a damn regardless of the class they play. Lvl range won't change that.

Sullon had exp death and NO LVL LIMIT!

Rallos had 4 lvls and item loss.

Ya gotta be bluer than a smurf penis to cry about 8 lvls when you lose nothing on death.

[Hamburgalur]

Originally Posted by Swyft [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Sullon had exp death and NO LVL LIMIT

Well that's just stupid, hanging at high levels slaying lowbies like you're hot shit. Lol what a joke.

[Rheon]

Dumb Idea..played when server was -8 +8, pop was low and new players who were trying to lvl were just being griefed off the box by super twinks more so then they are now. +4 -4 and exp group bonus is the best thing to happen to this server IMHO.

[Swyft]

Originally Posted by Hamburgalur [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Well that's just stupid, hanging at high levels slaying lowbies like you're hot shit. Lol what a joke.

LOL wtf you talking about unless you went to Sullon day one and neckbearded it ya had to survive in a world where 60's could murder lvl 12's and no safezones!

Or Rallos where every death meant ya lost an item.

And ya'll crying about death when you lose nothing because it's 8 lvls, you smurfs wont be happy till the only pvp on red is /duel lol WoW kids go emocide on pvp-death.

[xblade724]

Originally Posted by Bazia [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

as a wizard or druid u could be naked and get a kill

doesnt apply to most classes

^ This. This. All of the one's QQing about levels are OP solo classes that are probably the griefers of our server causing people to leave anyway..

Arguing that they want to kill higher levels instead of lower levels lol...

Ok then, how about +8/-4? The lower levels can engage on the higher levels, but the higher levels can't engage on the lower levels. There's your argument~ If someone is stupid enough to mess with someone 8 lvls higher, they can try. Like accepting a /duel. What about this proposal?
"Glares at you threateningly -- Are you sure you want to do that? Your body is probably not ready (power level over 9000)."
"Glares at you threateningly -- He is too fluffy for you to engage; your body is too OP."

[Swyft]

Originally Posted by xblade724 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

^ This. This. All of the one's QQing about levels are OP solo classes that are probably the griefers of our server causing people to leave anyway..

Arguing that they want to kill higher levels instead of lower levels lol...

Ok then, how about +8/-4? The lower levels can engage on the higher levels, but the higher levels can't engage on the lower levels. There's your argument~ If someone is stupid enough to mess with someone 8 lvls higher, they can try. Like accepting a /duel. What about this proposal?
"Glares at you threateningly -- Are you sure you want to do that? Your body is probably not ready (power level over 9000)."
"Glares at you threateningly -- He is too fluffy for you to engage; your body is too OP."

or we could just keep it classic ya know like it's suppose to be since this is PROJECT 1999!

And either choose no lvl limit and exp death in 8 lvls, item loot, or accept 8 lvls as a happy medium...since this is supposed to be a classic server...

or play wow!

BTW Bazia is a fully decked out warrior who griefs lvl 40's in rags lmfao! Blue's are the griefers cuz they can't pvp people there own lvl without a massive gear advantage, reds just want more targets they don't care if they are higher or lower.

The 4 lvl limit protects griefers more so than the ones they are killing, 8 lvl's would mean that even the best geared griefer is in trouble when someone skilled and 8 lvls higher finds them. 4 lvls is the perfect buffer for a lvl 26 MM twink, would take an equal twink to run him out when meanwhile a 34 in descent gear could cleanse him from the zone quite easily.

[xblade724]

Originally Posted by Swyft [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

or we could just keep it classic ya know like it's suppose to be since this is PROJECT 1999!

And either choose no lvl limit and exp death in 8 lvls, item loot, or accept 8 lvls as a happy medium...since this is supposed to be a classic server...

or play wow!

BTW Bazia is a fully decked out warrior who griefs lvl 40's in rags lmfao! Blue's are the griefers cuz they can't pvp people there own lvl without a massive gear advantage, reds just want more targets they don't care if they are higher or lower.

The 4 lvl limit protects griefers more so than the ones they are killing, 8 lvl's would mean that even the best geared griefer is in trouble when someone skilled and 8 lvls higher finds them. 4 lvls is the perfect buffer for a lvl 26 MM twink, would take an equal twink to run him out when meanwhile a 34 in descent gear could cleanse him from the zone quite easily.

Oh , okay, yea let's make it +8 levels so that the twinks can kill super twinks, and the first-char leveling guys get beat unfairly -- right? Sorry you guys are already max level, but find your own content, some of us are still trying to level and don't have twink gear to barely sustain someone 4 levels higher...

You guys wanted the population to return, right? Well if it changes away from +4/-4, you will see the population drop fast from rage quitters (genuine ones, not QQ ones, where some twink 8 lvls higher, that would ALREADY be tough if only 4 levels higher, 2 shots you repeatedly, and the griefers will be higher than the actual players~

[Swyft]

Originally Posted by xblade724 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Oh , okay, yea let's make it +8 levels so that the twinks can kill super twinks, and the first-char leveling guys get beat unfairly -- right? Sorry you guys are already max level, but find your own content, some of us are still trying to level and don't have twink gear to barely sustain someone 4 levels higher...

I am not max lvl I stay lower so I don't only have 4 lvl's of people to kill. Your freaking crying to someone who grew up with 8 lvls and had 5 empty slots, rocking an adviser robe.

I'm asking for the same thing I had to go through WTF should you get it easy when I got it hard? If you can't handle it than you don't belong on red, we shouldn't have to change the rules to make red more comforting to blue player's lol

Pop increased the minute Nihilum folded 4 lvl limit had zero. LET ME SAY IT AGAIN ZERO AS IN YOU CAN GIVE ZERO EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT LVL LIMIT INCREASING POP NONE, ZIP, ZILCH, NIX, NODDA!

We already have enough blue's here that just want to raid dragons all day, they are worthless to the pop and increase pvp not at all. They as much of a real pop as a dual boxed clone. If you don't embrace pvp, and that means not always having the advantage, then for real you don't belong here and no matter how much we change the rules ya never will!

[Rec]

+/-1

you want real pvp get to 60.

[phacemeltar]

i think it would be cool if purple, and no lvl restrictions for tk