Police Officers

[Karrmer]

Man, this was way too easy. I miss the Sullon Zek boards sometimes, at least it was a mild challenge.

[Bojangles]

Originally Posted by Abacab *****h [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'm a fan of dismantling police forces since they are extensions of local government (I.E hired through city planners) and hiring private contractors for security. Since they would no longer be under the pay-roll of the government but instead the pay-roll of private citizens it creates a lot less instances of corruption.

I'll assume this is a troll, since even though liberals are retarded enough to believe something this stupid, this idea would be against their ideology. If this is not a troll, please explain how putting all sanctioned armed power in the hands of the rich people in a neighborhood is a good idea. If you think cops in narcotics are on the take now, just wait till their official salary is paid for by the richest drug dealers in the area.


You faggoty ivory tower liberals have no clue what you are talking about when you talk about the justice system. You see a few bleeding heart movies, and allow your weak minds to be indoctrinated by others who have no clue what they are talking about, and you feel justified in drawing conclusions about something without providing any statistics or real arguments, just conclusory statements.

The only problem with our justice system is we let criminals go. If we immediately executed all criminals after their 3rd felony, w/o any appeals, crime would quickly dry up. Life imprisonment would also help things a lot, but of course would be much more expensive than the extermination of the offenders.

About 98% of Americans will never spend a single day in jail. The other 2% are the problem, and they cannot be deterred or reformed. They can only be exterminated or locked away.

Some stats from http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/index.cfm?ty=tp&tid=17:

"Of the 272,111 persons released from prisons in 15 states in 1994, an estimated 67.5% were rearrested for a felony or serious misdemeanor within 3 years, 46.9% were reconvicted, and 25.4% resentenced to prison for a new crime."

"These offenders had accumulated 4.1 million arrest charges before their most recent imprisonment and another 744,000 charges within 3 years of release."


Look at that last paragraph again: 272,111 had been arrested 4.1 million times before that year, with another 744,000 charges within 3 years of release. That is over 17 arrests per person... And that is only what they got caught doing, imagine how many other felonies were committed before they were stupid enough to get caught again.

Anything else you want to blame for the system's "problems" pale in comparison with this. And the fault does not lie with the justice system, it lies with the legislative and judicial branches that refuse to do what needs to be done due to faggotry and pussification.

[purist]

Originally Posted by Bojangles

RRRRRRRRRRRRRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE EEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

[mimixownzall]

A big problem, for some reason, is the left forget that people make a decision to break the law.

[Bodeanicus]

Originally Posted by mimixownzall [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

A big problem, for some reason, is the left forget that people make a decision to break the law.

A bigger problem is that authoritarian pussy ass kissers believe that anyone in a position of authority is to be automatically trusted, and said persons are always right, and always act responsibly. I mean, that person wouldn't be in that position if Baby Jeebus hadn't miracled their asses into it, now would they?

[Bodeanicus]

Originally Posted by Bojangles [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'll assume this is a troll, since even though liberals are retarded enough to believe something this stupid, this idea would be against their ideology. If this is not a troll, please explain how putting all sanctioned armed power in the hands of the rich people in a neighborhood is a good idea. If you think cops in narcotics are on the take now, just wait till their official salary is paid for by the richest drug dealers in the area.


You faggoty ivory tower liberals have no clue what you are talking about when you talk about the justice system. You see a few bleeding heart movies, and allow your weak minds to be indoctrinated by others who have no clue what they are talking about, and you feel justified in drawing conclusions about something without providing any statistics or real arguments, just conclusory statements.

The only problem with our justice system is we let criminals go. If we immediately executed all criminals after their 3rd felony, w/o any appeals, crime would quickly dry up. Life imprisonment would also help things a lot, but of course would be much more expensive than the extermination of the offenders.

About 98% of Americans will never spend a single day in jail. The other 2% are the problem, and they cannot be deterred or reformed. They can only be exterminated or locked away.

Some stats from http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/index.cfm?ty=tp&tid=17:

"Of the 272,111 persons released from prisons in 15 states in 1994, an estimated 67.5% were rearrested for a felony or serious misdemeanor within 3 years, 46.9% were reconvicted, and 25.4% resentenced to prison for a new crime."

"These offenders had accumulated 4.1 million arrest charges before their most recent imprisonment and another 744,000 charges within 3 years of release."


Look at that last paragraph again: 272,111 had been arrested 4.1 million times before that year, with another 744,000 charges within 3 years of release. That is over 17 arrests per person... And that is only what they got caught doing, imagine how many other felonies were committed before they were stupid enough to get caught again.

Anything else you want to blame for the system's "problems" pale in comparison with this. And the fault does not lie with the justice system, it lies with the legislative and judicial branches that refuse to do what needs to be done due to faggotry and pussification.

So frightened. The big bad black men are coming to fuck your mom. Run now!

[Dukat]

Originally Posted by Bodeanicus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So frightened. The big bad black men are coming to fuck your mom. Run now!

Its too bad some big black men wont come and fuck you, bro. I'm not trying to be hostile by saying this either bro, youd probably have the best time of your life

[guineapig]

Originally Posted by Bojangles [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I think this proves that you are a liberal. You blatantly state that you think it is merely an opinion that law and order is what keeps society running, and that opposing law and order is a perfectly viable stance for a mainstream political party.

Reading comprehension fail. I believe your original statement was an opinion.
You can try to twist my words any way you want but you basically likened liberals to anarchists which is fucking retarded.

Won't even bother quoting the rest of your BS, there's just no point.

Regardless of what my political affiliation is, and you are still wrong, you are a completely polarized headcase who is just making himself look a fool. Keep up the good fight.

[guineapig]

To clarify, you stated that:

because side #1 (your side? the "good guys"?, white people?)

support "law and order"

that side #2 (liberals? what do you call them these days... colored folk?) must automatically oppose it.

Is that really the best you could come up with when I brought up factions discrediting each other? This is something that a 5th grader would have come up with as an answer to an essay question.

This is why you aren't even worth dealing with. It is such an ignorant statement that I don't even know where to begin.

Is that all that "side #1" stands for?
Is a conservative that breaks the law automatically a liberal? Because that seems to be what you are trying to define.
Do you live in a cave by chance?

[Bodeanicus]

Originally Posted by Dukat [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Its too bad some big black men wont come and fuck you, bro. I'm not trying to be hostile by saying this either bro, youd probably have the best time of your life

No thanks, bro. I'd rather bro bro bro bro bro bro. Bro.