religion

[Eliseus]

Originally Posted by leewong [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Lol, the fact you think you are even remotely intelligent is the funniest part. You cant even read a full paragraph without getting lost and taking things out of context. Keep trying though. One day you may actually come up with an argument that debunks 170+ years of evolutionary studies and thousands of scientists with PHDs.

Ok pumpkin.

[leewong]

Originally Posted by RobotElvis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Bacteria that's still bacteria. What a nail in the coffin for ID

I posted bacteria as a response to the claim that, "no mutation is beneficial". Bacteria evolve resistances which are beneficial. Keep up with the conversation.

[G13]

Originally Posted by paulgiamatti [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Eliseus, RobotElvis and G13 are disqualified from this discussion.

Really?

Our posting privileges have been removed from this thread? Could have fooled me.

What a hilarious Fascist you are. Typical mouth dragging simpleton. When you can't refute facts you declare the debate over and everyone who doesn't buy into your Materialism and Evolution lies is "disqualified"

You are only making yourself look weak and small. Keep it up.

[Eliseus]

Originally Posted by leewong [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I posted bacteria as a response to the claim that, "no mutation is beneficial". Bacteria evolve resistances which are beneficial. Keep up with the conversation.

Be careful on your next step robot. He will tell you are stupid you are to try a deter from his own ignorance.

[leewong]

Originally Posted by Eliseus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Ok pumpkin.

Nice rebuttal...you sack of shit.

[leewong]

Originally Posted by Eliseus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

He will tell you are stupid

I call em like I see em.

[iruinedyourday]

man u gotta check this thread 1 second after you post if you want to see your fuckn post on the current page.

Yall mother fuckers know there are new celeb pics out there right now?

[Glenzig]

Originally Posted by leewong [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Lol, the fact you think you are even remotely intelligent is the funniest part. You cant even read a full paragraph without getting lost and taking things out of context. Keep trying though. One day you may actually come up with an argument that debunks 170+ years of evolutionary studies and thousands of scientists with PHDs.

I believe this particular logical fallacy is called "the appeal to authority".

By the way, theologians have PHD's also. Does that qualify them to decide for everyone what is correct or incorrect?

[Eliseus]

Originally Posted by leewong [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Nice rebuttal...you sack of shit.

This right here supports exactly what I was saying earlier how leewrong is not only hypocritical, but he resorts to this right here. On another note, you didn't give me your opinion on

Originally Posted by Eliseus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

For someone so obsessed with Charles Darwin, I'm surprised you haven't read some of the quotes.

"In the long history of humankind (and animal kind, too) those who learned to collaborate and improvise most effectively have prevailed."

Which you are far from.

"A moral being is one who is capable of reflecting on his past actions and their motives - of approving of some and disapproving of others."

Which completely negates the earlier convo that there is no 1 country like another if you base morals off that.

"The mystery of the beginning of all things is insoluble by us; and I for one must be content to remain an agnostic."

Basically, you argue that a guy who knows it all, admits he doesn't have a clue.

"My mind seems to have become a kind of machine for grinding general laws out of large collections of facts."

Almost contradicts his last statement which in turn destroys some of his credibility.

"On the ordinary view of each species having been independently created, we gain no scientific explanation."

Oh I see, so this in line with one of the earlier quotes = evolution? We don't need facts, we can just make claims.

How about

"I am quite conscious that my speculations run quite beyond the bounds of true science."

You get the point I'm getting at. Actually, you probable don't, I don't know why I even posted these quotes.

In the end of this post I leave you with this.

"...I feel most deeply that the whole subject is too profound for the human intellect. A dog might as well speculate on the mind of Newton.— Let each man hope & believe what he can.—"

so quoting it for you. I want to know what derogatory term I will be called for this one. I'm writing a book on it, so please don't hold back.

[Whirled]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

http://www.funnyjunk.com/funny_gifs/...yjunk+comments