Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #361  
Old 01-30-2015, 05:30 PM
Juevento Juevento is offline
Sarnak

Juevento's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 292
Default

And your opinion of the current TMO incarnation?
__________________
Juevento - 60 Rogue <BDA>

Juevento - Druid <Free Agent>
  #362  
Old 01-30-2015, 05:32 PM
Man0warr Man0warr is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,734
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cs616 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Love how BDA is defending against a lot of the same accusations they were throwing at class C guilds, and using the same arguments class C did. Anyone remember Taken saving BDA at naggy? Guess teaming up there is fine, just as long as you claim there wasn't an agreement before hand.
Other way around, and Taken didn't need saving.


Quote:
Originally Posted by cs616 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Given that class C was created because BDA didn't want to play the game the same way hard core guild do, it's ammusing that they're now the people trying to force others to play the game their way. The hard core guilds don't try to make rules that force people how to play, they just adapt to whatever rules are set. Sure, everyone lobbies for rules that benefit them, but the server is in the state it is because it has become common practice to respond to every casual cry and complaint about fairness by adding more rules under the guise of creating fairness. If this wasn't common practice, rule lawyering wouldn't be effective because it wouldn't be worth anyone's time. We're in this situation because of our willingness to alter rules to try and make everyone happy.
Class C was created because Rogean was tired of TMO/IB/FE shitting everything up for the whole server.

While Chest was vocal, every none TMO/IB/FE guild wanted changes that created segregation between the two playstyles.
__________________
Green
Tofusin - Monk <Force of Will>
Manowarr - Druid

Blue
Tofusin - 60 Monk <BDA>
Shiroe - 60 Enchanter
Manowarr - 60 Druid
  #363  
Old 01-30-2015, 05:33 PM
cs616 cs616 is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 132
Default

It may have been BDA saving taken at naggy now that I think about it. Either way you get the point. Also, hilarious to see BDA jokingly threaten to split into numerous smaller guilds... That sounds familiar too.
  #364  
Old 01-30-2015, 05:37 PM
skipdog skipdog is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 462
Default

It is incredibly hilarious to watch BDA members trot out literally the exact same arguments class C members used against them a year ago to justify their desire to break the rotation. I remember BDA members crying about not wanting to have to recruit zerg members to compete, and how they all have lives and jobs and can't be expected to kill stuff at 3am like some no-life neckbeards in TMO. And now they have demanded that these other smaller class R guilds, resort to zerg recruiting in order to 'earn their pixels'. I might have to start digging up quotes from BDA members a year ago to show how some of you are literally using the exact arguments TMO did.

It boggles my mind, that some BDA members can be so blind to how BDA is now acting in this exact scenario. It basically goes against everything BDA has ever said about how they wish to approach raid scene on this server.
  #365  
Old 01-30-2015, 05:38 PM
Funkutron5000 Funkutron5000 is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 473
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cs616 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
It may have been BDA saving taken at naggy now that I think about it. Either way you get the point. Also, hilarious to see BDA jokingly threaten to split into numerous smaller guilds... That sounds familiar too.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y-Elr5K2Vuo
__________________
Corova Moloko, Crusader and Guild Leader of The Mystical Order
  #366  
Old 01-30-2015, 05:38 PM
Kekephee Kekephee is offline
Fire Giant

Kekephee's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 719
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cs616 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
It may have been BDA saving taken at naggy now that I think about it. Either way you get the point. Also, hilarious to see BDA jokingly threaten to split into numerous smaller guilds... That sounds familiar too.
Your point is that we're championing "no help for anyone ever" but what we're championing is "no permanent and consistent alliances that allow guilds that can't kill mobs to still have spots on the rotation because they just get help every single time the mobs pop." I'm sure you must see the difference.

And who cares what we're joking about? "Jokingly threaten" is such a hilarious choice of words. A threat is a threat, a joke is a joke, you can't make a threat without trying to convince someone that it's real and you can't make a joke about something you actually plan to do, and it's beyond clear which of those "BDA 1-40" is.
__________________
Kekephee Souphanousinphone
Erudite Bard <BDA>
Blue Server


Every song I play is actually just me screaming the 1812 Overture in a raspy, shrieking falsetto.
  #367  
Old 01-30-2015, 05:41 PM
Kekephee Kekephee is offline
Fire Giant

Kekephee's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 719
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by skipdog [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
It is incredibly hilarious to watch BDA members trot out literally the exact same arguments class C members used against them a year ago to justify their desire to break the rotation. I remember BDA members crying about not wanting to have to recruit zerg members to compete, and how they all have lives and jobs and can't be expected to kill stuff at 3am like some no-life neckbeards in TMO. And now they have demanded that these other smaller class R guilds, resort to zerg recruiting in order to 'earn their pixels'. I might have to start digging up quotes from BDA members a year ago to show how some of you are literally using the exact arguments TMO did.

It boggles my mind, that some BDA members can be so blind to how BDA is now acting in this exact scenario. It basically goes against everything BDA has ever said about how they wish to approach raid scene on this server.
See above for difference

Further explanation:

Once again, raid rotation was meant to give everyone who was capable of killing mobs the chance to kill them, not to make the whole server stand there watching impotently as a group of 6 wipes on Trak a million times because they have a spot in the rotation. If you can't kill the mob, you shouldn't be on the rotation for it. That's different from never getting to kill a mob you can kill because one guild is willing to sit on a spawn point for a week spamming javs.
__________________
Kekephee Souphanousinphone
Erudite Bard <BDA>
Blue Server


Every song I play is actually just me screaming the 1812 Overture in a raspy, shrieking falsetto.
  #368  
Old 01-30-2015, 05:44 PM
Clasick Clasick is offline
Scrawny Gnoll


Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 27
Default

BDA trying to force their play style on other class R guilds.
Such fucking hypocrites
  #369  
Old 01-30-2015, 05:46 PM
Amra Amra is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 62
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cs616 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
It may have been BDA saving taken at naggy now that I think about it. Either way you get the point. Also, hilarious to see BDA jokingly threaten to split into numerous smaller guilds... That sounds familiar too.
Didn't we get suspended from the Next Class R Naggy? Or that didn't happen?

Sorry I don't care about Naggy.
  #370  
Old 01-30-2015, 05:46 PM
kaev kaev is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,909
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clasick [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
BDA trying to force their play style on other class R guilds.
Such fucking hypocrites
0 out of 2 correct, but then you knew that already
__________________
crabby old man playing 4000 year old goblin sim
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:43 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.