DayBreak - Titanium Client

[drktmplr12]

Originally Posted by Clark [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I've been saying it multiple times since it happened, and no one has refuted it. There is overwhelming speculation on my part. The main piece being he had zero public thanking for service, and immediate termination. Something we witnessed happen to Amelinda. Sometimes it's just a dog in a shark costume though to some people I guess.

ftfy

Lack of opposition doesn't prove anything. Lack of public thanking for service doesn't prove anything. Immediate resignation doesn't prove anything. Similar circumstances to a proven case doesn't prove anything. Everything you are claiming is supposition. To pass it off as certainty is, in my opinion, not really fair to the accused. The only things that makes it 100% certain are (1) an admission by the accused or (2) a log showing transactions took place. You have provided neither. In conclusion, you have only proven that you have faith in your belief, which you are entitled to.

By the way, this is the first time I've seen the expression dog in shark costume. Don't see how the expression applies to the conversation. Anyone care to explain? Is it the converse of wolf in sheep's clothing?

To add to the actual thread:
What do they really stand to gain by monetizing the titanium client? It's not going to be very much and likely isn't worth the trouble for them. Think about it. They would need to dedicate server space and bandwidth to it (although it can be argued to be very cheap since they have the hardware already). They still need to pay people to package it, test it, implement the mirror. Let's say 1000 people download it for 10 bucks, which i think is a generous # of downloads. That's 10,000 dollars. I promise that barely pays the cost of implementing.

[Clark]

Originally Posted by drktmplr12 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

By the way, this is the first time I've seen the expression dog in shark costume. Don't see how the expression applies to the conversation. Anyone care to explain? Is it the converse of wolf in sheep's clothing?

You guys all made my week thank you; love the pictures. Also my previous statements seem to reign true, and have not been debunked. As Young Jay Z says on to the next one.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]