Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #271  
Old 10-22-2015, 05:35 PM
falkun falkun is offline
Planar Protector

falkun's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Ruins of Old Sebilis
Posts: 2,464
Default

Your raid location is not our problem when we did not train over you. By your logic, you expect us to train Ikatair BACK to his room, and drop aggro there. NO ONE does this. The best ANYONE does is let a mob reset. Well guess what BDA was doing? Letting a mob reset. It is not BDA's fault that YOUR raid was in the way of a mob resetting. Also, if Elament had stayed in the cubby, he would not have aggroed Ikatair. It is not BDA's fault YOUR PULLER aggroed Ikatair and brought him to camp when your raid was ill prepared to engage him.
  #272  
Old 10-22-2015, 05:36 PM
Maner Maner is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 571
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JboxCSU [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Think of it this way -
Scenario 1 - Guild A pulls a mobs all the way the fuck across a zone. My thought is they own that train as the mob(s) return to their spawn point.

Scenario 2 - Guild A pulls mob halfway across the zone, Guild B tags it and drops it off all the way across the zone. In this case, Guild B the mob from where they tagged the mob to the zone line, and Guild A owns it from their loss of aggro to the mobs spawn.

Scenario 3 - Guild A pulls a mob all the way across the zone, drops aggro and the mob starts walking back. Guild B attempts to split, and drags the mobs slightly off course of their return path, and drops aggro. In this case, Guild B owns the train from the mobs patching back to where they snagged aggro from the mobs. Guild A takes the train back when the mobs start walking back on their original path.

This situation is Scenario 3. That fucking train was walking down that path whether or not BDA attempted the split or not.

My opinion it's Takens train.
your opinion would be correct if BDA hadn't attempted to peel from takens pull, since BDA has admitted they wanted to split out iki, they knowingly took responsibility for the train. You cant say it would have been takens fault if BDA hadn't touched it so its takens fault after BDA touched it....
  #273  
Old 10-22-2015, 05:37 PM
Maner Maner is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 571
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by falkun [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Your raid location is not our problem when we did not train over you. By your logic, you expect us to train Ikatair BACK to his room, and drop aggro there. NO ONE does this. The best ANYONE does is let a mob reset. Well guess what BDA was doing? Letting a mob reset. It is not BDA's fault that YOUR raid was in the way of a mob resetting. Also, if Elament had stayed in the cubby, he would not have aggroed Ikatair. It is not BDA's fault YOUR PULLER aggroed Ikatair and brought him to camp when your raid was ill prepared to engage him.
so mages are pullers now?
  #274  
Old 10-22-2015, 05:38 PM
falkun falkun is offline
Planar Protector

falkun's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Ruins of Old Sebilis
Posts: 2,464
Default

How can you say its BDA's fault after Taken touched it and also not conclude its Forgard's fault after BDA touched it?
  #275  
Old 10-22-2015, 05:38 PM
falkun falkun is offline
Planar Protector

falkun's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Ruins of Old Sebilis
Posts: 2,464
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Maner [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
so mages are pullers now?
Its EQ, anyone's a puller that gets FTE.
  #276  
Old 10-22-2015, 05:39 PM
JboxCSU JboxCSU is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 112
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Maner [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
your opinion would be correct if BDA hadn't attempted to peel from takens pull, since BDA has admitted they wanted to split out iki, they knowingly took responsibility for the train. You cant say it would have been takens fault if BDA hadn't touched it so its takens fault after BDA touched it....
If BDA tried to split, they own tje train from where they took aggro to where they dropped it.

Again, If BDA didn't attempt to split, all those mobs were going to take that path anyways.
  #277  
Old 10-22-2015, 05:39 PM
falkun falkun is offline
Planar Protector

falkun's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Ruins of Old Sebilis
Posts: 2,464
Default

And mages make fantastic pullers. TMO used them to great effect when the rules dictated no PC could be on 1.5 to pull nobles. Send a mage pet up to noble and there's not a PC on the island!
  #278  
Old 10-22-2015, 05:41 PM
jcr4990 jcr4990 is offline
Banned


Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 397
Default

So lemme get this straight. Taken pulls mob across zone. BDA tries to pull as its pathing back and fails. Forsaken pulls unintentionally as its pathing back and wipes. God damn BDA's fault again!

Makes a lot of sense dude. You totally aren't making yourself look like a fool. Please keep posting.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #279  
Old 10-22-2015, 06:00 PM
Zampini Zampini is offline
Scrawny Gnoll


Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 22
Default

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #280  
Old 10-22-2015, 06:51 PM
Gimp Gimp is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 547
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Maner [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
so mages are pullers now?
I used to FTE in VP on a chanter.

So yes, mages are pullers.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:39 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.