#51
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#52
|
|||
|
You can't really claim to be holding back judgment when you've already licked police boot repeatedly in this very thread.
| ||
|
#53
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#54
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
BLUE 46 Warrior - Elkantor, 35 Shadowknight - Geldriia, 46 Enchanter - Shebreeze | |||
|
#55
|
|||
|
The force appears warranted.
| ||
|
#56
|
||||
|
Quote:
Apparently I am hearing this officer has a history of possible bad judgement. Also Orruar denying her entry the next day would be safer because she wouldn't be able to stonewall or create a more dangerous situation by being locked into a desk. The officer could just block her, tell her shes not allowed on the premise today, and to go home or face arrest. Arresting a standing person is very simple and the officer is very well-trained on making arrests in the standing position and SAFE TACTICS and protocol on making a standard arrest, with regards to to gaining compliance and stopping resistance while in a standing struggle. This was incredibly violent and dangerous. And shame on the school for putting the officer into this situation. The teacher, the principle, and everyone involved in calling the officer to this situation to act as a PRIVATE BOUNCER. Again, we do not know if the girl was breaking any actual laws other than texting and using a cellphone. If so, this is even more disgusting on the schools part. And the Sheriff needs to ban these types of bar-room bouncer situations. Sending an officer to demand her cellphone? Its an officers job to confiscate a girls cellphone because she is texting? Hello police state. At least the Sheriff recognizes its very bullshit to even have officers injected into these situations. And constitutional rights were definitely violated here. The officer had no right to attempt cellphone confiscation without probable cause for a CRIMINAL investigation or as part of a criminal investigation. Such as playing loud music, disturbing the peace, overheard selling drugs on the phone, etc. Which she obviously was not. Silently texting with a few beeps is legal. That is a school admin problem, not a law enforcement problem. Shame on the school and the thugs involved. | |||
Last edited by AzzarTheGod; 10-29-2015 at 05:45 PM..
|
|
#57
|
||||
|
How to deal with kids:
http://www.attn.com/stories/3894/dc-...paign=internal "Instead of us fighting, she tried to turn it around and make it something fun," Aaliyah Taylor, the 17-year-old senior who dance-battled the as-yet unnamed cop told the Washington Post. "I never expected cops to be that cool." Quote:
IMO no we dont. What we see in the video is excessive force, it makes no difference what the girl was 'suspected' of doing prior or what the officer thinks he saw her do before... its not up to him to decide whether she is guilty and deserves to be violently attacked by a police officer. There are plenty of examples of non excessive force and that's what this officer decided not to use because what the video does show is he obviously has anger management issues, which should prevent him from being a police officer in the first place. | |||
Last edited by iruinedyourday; 10-29-2015 at 05:45 PM..
|
|
#58
|
||||
|
Quote:
This smells like a real potential bumblefuck of legal problems, excessive force being one of them. The fact excessive force happened without dotting all their I's and crossing their T's could make things worse. Especially if the initial complaint was she wouldn't stop using her cellphone and refused to hand over her personal property. Edit: More details are out, he is known as a head-breaker and chief brutal enforcer at the school for a few years now, and a bodybuilding guy so possible steroid use. He has beat up a lot of people. I am so surprised [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] | |||
Last edited by AzzarTheGod; 10-29-2015 at 06:19 PM..
|
|
|
|