Bernie Sanders is a bad ass

[iruinedyourday]

Best interview with a presidential candidate that youll ever see part 1

Best interview with a presidential candidate that youll ever see part 2

Best interview with a presidential candidate that youll ever see part 3

Best interview with a presidential candidate that youll ever see part 4

Best interview with a presidential candidate that youll ever see part 5

Best interview with a presidential candidate that youll ever see part 6

He's the best in the world, and the only one actually talking about politics that matter, not just trying to get a contract spot on Fox News for the rest of his life.

Only one qualified, only one with the heart, only one with a brain of his own, only one with a brain at all, only one who deserves the election.

Back him or you're backing hillary. If there is one thing we all can agree on is, we don't want Hillary in the whitehouse.

[KagatobLuvsAnimu]

I don't have to watch the videos to know without a doubt that everything he proposed is fiscally impossible.

[Lune]

Originally Posted by KagatobLuvsAnimu [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I don't have to watch the videos to know without a doubt that everything he proposed is fiscally impossible.

Denmark, Canada, Australia, Japan, Germany, etc etc etc do it, and we're wealthier than they are.

If we didn't spend so much money driving obsolete aircraft carriers around the world and subsidizing the patron industries of corrupt officials, we'd be able to afford nice social programs too.

[iruinedyourday]

Originally Posted by Lune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Denmark, Canada, Australia, Japan, Germany, etc etc etc do it, and we're wealthier than they are.

If we didn't spend so much money driving obsolete aircraft carriers around the world and subsidizing the patron industries of corrupt officials, we'd be able to afford nice social programs too.

yea but yea but how else will we support our military if we don't take care of our veterans and drive air craft carriers around for no reason??

[AzzarTheGod]

Originally Posted by Lune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Denmark, Canada, Australia, Japan, Germany, etc etc etc do it, and we're wealthier than they are.

If we didn't spend so much money driving obsolete aircraft carriers around the world and subsidizing the patron industries of corrupt officials, we'd be able to afford nice social programs too.

This. Those bailout billions given arbitrarily year after year in a so-called capitalist system where you are supposed to face your failures without intervention in the private sector, does NOT pay dividends to the taxpayer.

[Patriam1066]

Originally Posted by Lune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Denmark, Canada, Australia, Japan, Germany, etc etc etc do it, and we're wealthier than they are.

If we didn't spend so much money driving obsolete aircraft carriers around the world and subsidizing the patron industries of corrupt officials, we'd be able to afford nice social programs too.

Half of those countries are rich because we don't have tariffs

America subsidizes everyone but ourselves, /sigh

I don't hate Bernie. I don't think for a second, however, that increasing the national debt is anything more than perpetual corporate welfare directing taxpayer money to the banks. The banks get permanent assets on their balance sheets and leftists don't care. It's bewildering to me, but then again I get pissed when I lose a penny

[iruinedyourday]

Originally Posted by Patriam1066 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Half of those countries are rich because we don't have tariffs

you misspelled taarof.

[Patriam1066]

Originally Posted by iruinedyourday [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

you misspelled taarof.

Please tell me you aren't Persian.

[Raev]

Originally Posted by Lune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Denmark, Canada, Australia, Japan, Germany, etc etc etc do it, and we're wealthier than they are.

Oh, that must explain http://www.dailysabah.com/europe/201...cover-expenses then.

Originally Posted by Kyff

The fundament of your question is worng. If done correctly taxation does not "seize the assets" but rather reduces them. Even with the inefficiencies inherent in large operations the result should not be poverty but a more balanced distribution of wealth.

As far as I can tell, this is a superb example of pure authentic Internet gibberish.

[Safon]

Bernie Sanders is a dreamer

We need a president who will attend to reality