Trumps family duel relations

[Daywolf]

Originally Posted by Trungep99 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Just because trump says something doesn't make it true.

More "click bait" for you to cover your eyes, ears and mouth about https://youtu.be/URztt7JEzrc

Riiiiight, not "illegal" because well what is illegal? eh? Guess depends on what the definition of is, is.

[R Flair]

Originally Posted by Trungep99 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Wrong,
They are protesting bigotry , not democracy.

In all honesty as a liberal who always hated Cruz for wanting to impose his religious beliefs on others I laughed my ass off regarding his fathers conspiracy theory. That truly was hilarious.
But still, all this name calling based on someone's demographics needs to stop. Everyone Trump makes fun of sooner or later then gets radical supports sending thyme death threats, look at Kelly Ann, she had to have security with her ever since she challenged Trumps statements regarding women.

its like every post with you is buzzword bingo. How about you come forth with some real evidence of bigotry or sexism or racism backed with dictionary definitions instead of parroting the msm like a brainwashed fetus.

[Lojik]

Originally Posted by Trungep99 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I have in previous post and lack the time due to work to place so much effort. The easiest proof of racism is his current choices for some of his cabinet members. He has so far selected multiple people with questionable judgment . Even Ron Paul doesn't approve of some of them

Why would Ron Paul approve of anything Donald Trump does? He's libertarian. Neither candidate is going to go against wall street or big military

Speaking of Ron Paul, back when he was running there were articles about how Ron Paul was a racist...lol. He's basically like Bernie Sanders except at opposite ends of the free trade spectrum and more articulate. When you try to label every opposition candidate as racist, bigot, etc., you're trying to tell the American public they only have 1 choice (essentially no choice.) Guess what, people got sick of it. So much so that they elected someone who has lots of conflicts of interest being president, isn't exactly "diplomatic," and who has said a lot of dumb shit. Instead of explaining how good Hillary's policies would be, how great she'd be for this country etc., they tried to tout the same old shit about how anyone who doesn't have (D) in front of their name on the ballot is racist (except maybe Jill Stein, she's just a wacko right!) People like having choices, even if they make really bad decisions.

[R Flair]

Originally Posted by Lojik [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Why would Ron Paul approve of anything Donald Trump does? He's libertarian. Neither candidate is going to go against wall street or big military

Speaking of Ron Paul, back when he was running there were articles about how Ron Paul was a racist...lol. He's basically like Bernie Sanders except at opposite ends of the free trade spectrum and more articulate. When you try to label every opposition candidate as racist, bigot, etc., you're trying to tell the American public they only have 1 choice (essentially no choice.) Guess what, people got sick of it. So much so that they elected someone who has lots of conflicts of interest being president, isn't exactly "diplomatic," and who has said a lot of dumb shit. Instead of explaining how good Hillary's policies would be, how great she'd be for this country etc., they tried to tout the same old shit about how anyone who doesn't have (D) in front of their name on the ballot is racist (except maybe Jill Stein, she's just a wacko right!) People like having choices, even if they make really bad decisions.

Just let them keep doing it. They will never win another election using this tired thought-policing "everyone's a racist" fearmongering. Normal americans see through it and that is why someone as flawed as Trump still obliterated their candidate that should have been a shoo in. They are stuck in their media bubble.

[R Flair]

Liberal Dictionary :

Racist : A person, or entity, that does not agree with you.

Bigot : A person, or entity, that does not agree with you.

Xenophobe: A person, or entity, that does not agree with you.

Anti-semite: A person, or entity, that does not agree with you.

Uneducated: A person, or entity, that does not agree with you.

Fascist: A person, or entity, that does not agree with you.

Deplorable: A person, or entity, that does not agree with you.

[maskedmelon]

Trump is not a racist or a sexist or a bigot in any form. He's a dick to people he don't like and he's going to cut you about something you can't change, because that hurts the most and there's no simple rebuttal for it. If someone tells a man that he cannot do something because he is a man, the man's can't just respond "nuh uh, am not!" He has to chase he squirrel of why men in general actually are capable of doing that thing. It places your opponent on the defensive.

Trump's not going to use attacks like that referencing white men, because he is one. If he has to attack a white man, which he does all the time, he'll attack their demeanor or their looks or their disability, because again those are things that can't really be changed and damage confidence while setting the opponent on the defensive.

[AzzarTheGod]

Originally Posted by Raev [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Women are less happy than they were 35 years ago both absolutely and relative to men. If you don't like Milo's article, then what's your explanation?

Raev droppin hammers on em

Originally Posted by maskedmelon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Trump is not a racist or a sexist or a bigot in any form. He's a dick to people he don't like and he's going to cut you about something you can't change, because that hurts the most and there's no simple rebuttal for it. If someone tells a man that he cannot do something because he is a man, the man's can't just respond "nuh uh, am not!" He has to chase he squirrel of why men in general actually are capable of doing that thing. It places your opponent on the defensive.

Trump's not going to use attacks like that referencing white men, because he is one. If he has to attack a white man, which he does all the time, he'll attack their demeanor or their looks or their disability, because again those are things that can't really be changed and damage confidence while setting the opponent on the defensive.

good assessment of the master tactician. cya jeb

[Trungep99]

Originally Posted by R Flair [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

its like every post with you is buzzword bingo. How about you come forth with some real evidence of bigotry or sexism or racism backed with dictionary definitions instead of parroting the msm like a brainwashed fetus.

Why would I even need to ? It's like you were in a box the last year and completely ignored everything Trump stated against multiple minority's in our country.
Clearly you don't follow the current events about why his cabinet appointments and nepotism rules are important and are there to prevent corruption.

[R Flair]

Originally Posted by Trungep99 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Why would I even need to ? It's like you were in a box the last year and completely ignored everything Trump stated against multiple minority's in our country.
Clearly you don't follow the current events about why his cabinet appointments and nepotism rules are important and are there to prevent corruption.

k so you can't. thanks for clarifying

[Raev]

Originally Posted by Trungep99 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Why would I even need to ? It's like you were in a box the last year and completely ignored everything Trump stated against multiple minority's in our country.

The one who is ignoring Trump's statements is you. If Trump is the open racist that you claim, it should trivial to get damning statements from Google in 20 seconds. And yet, Trump's actual statements are quite benign. Plagiarizing from SSC:

Originally Posted by Donald Trump on African Americans via SSC

It is my highest and greatest hope that the Republican Party can be the home in the future and forevermore for African-Americans and the African-American vote because I will produce, and I will get others to produce, and we know for a fact it doesn’t work with the Democrats and it certainly doesn’t work with Hillary.

When I am President, I will work to ensure that all of our kids are treated equally, and protected equally. Every action I take, I will ask myself: does this make life better for young Americans in Baltimore, Chicago, Detroit, Ferguson who have as much of a right to live out their dreams as any other child in America?

African-American citizens have sacrificed so much for this nation. They have fought and died in every war since the Revolution, and from the pews and the picket lines they have lifted up the conscience of our country in the long march for Civil Rights. Yet, too many African-Americans have been left behind.

No group in America has been more harmed by Hillary Clinton’s policies than African-Americans. No group. No group. If Hillary Clinton’s goal was to inflict pain on the African-American community, she could not have done a better job. It’s a disgrace. Tonight, I am asking for the vote of every African-American citizen in this country who wants a better future.

And at the end of four years I guarantee that I will get over 95% of the African-American vote. I promise you. Because I will produce for the inner-cities and I will produce for the African-Americans.

America must reject the bigotry of Hillary Clinton who sees communities of color only as votes, not as human beings worthy of a better future.

Originally Posted by Donald Trump on Hispanics

I have just landed having returned from a very important and special meeting with the President of Mexico…we discussed the great contributions of Mexican-American citizens to our two countries, my love for the people of Mexico, and the close friendship between our two nations.

I employ thousands and thousands of Hispanics. I love the people. They’re great workers. They’re fantastic people and they want legal immigration. I’ll take jobs back from China, I’ll take jobs back from Japan. The Hispanics are going to get those jobs, and they’re going to love Trump.

Originally Posted by Donald Trump on White Supremacists

Donald Trump says he isn’t interested in the endorsement of David Duke, the anti-Semitic former Ku Klux Klan leader who praised the GOP presidential hopeful earlier this week on his radio show.

“I don’t need his endorsement; I certainly wouldn’t want his endorsement,” Trump said during an interview with Bloomberg’s Mark Halperin and John Heilemann. He added: “I don’t need anyone’s endorsement.”

Asked whether he would repudiate the endorsement, Trump said “Sure, I would if that would make you feel better.”

If you can find suitably damning quotes from Trump I will reconsider, but at the moment I'm putting you in the #Imwithher 'I have no logical policies so I will call my opponent a racist' camp.