Latest Ban on the Raid Scene: Awakened

[Lhancelot]

Originally Posted by Siberious [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

***Disclaimer*** I don't personally care about suspension lengths, simply stating Sirken seems to not be following his own rules that he has set. However Sirken knowingly violates the naming policy so this should come to no surprise.

Suddenly AG shows a pulse when AW gets suspended.

You guys should use some of that energy and try to get some mobs instead of saving it up to cry about how unfair it is when others get them.

You act like you paying a sub or something. Shut your filthy mouth about what Sirken does or doesn't do, this is his plot you aint running shit.

[AzzarTheGod]

tagged

[Heebs13]

Originally Posted by Lhancelot [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Suddenly AG shows a pulse when AW gets suspended.

You guys should use some of that energy and try to get some mobs instead of saving it up to cry about how unfair it is when others get them.

You act like you paying a sub or something. Shut your filthy mouth about what Sirken does or doesn't do, this is his plot you aint running shit.

Look out folks, this guy is a real keyboard warrior.

[arsenalpow]

The promise was escalating punishments years ago, never actually happens.

[radditsu]

I can’t even remember the name of that kunark asshole guild anymore.

[Sirken]

Originally Posted by Siberious [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You're a terrible thread. Bam, gotcha good! But for realz, the discussion should be why repeat offenses don't cause increased ban lengths as Sirken states they should in the rules.
https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...d.php?t=189856
Quoting from the above link.
***Disclaimer*** I don't personally care about suspension lengths, simply stating Sirken seems to not be following his own rules that he has set. However Sirken knowingly violates the naming policy so this should come to no surprise.

because the bit you bolded in your quote was not added until 10/18 and the petition was before that. this may be a shock, but rules dont retroactively apply.

[Siberious]

Originally Posted by Sirken [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

because the bit you bolded in your quote was not added until 10/18 and the petition was before that. this may be a shock, but rules dont retroactively apply.

Thought the part I bolded was there before as well, apparently this is incorrect - I wouldn't expect it to retroactively apply, i'm just noobin it up at forum-quest because slow work day and lolz.

[Heebs13]

Originally Posted by Siberious [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Thought the part I bolded was there before as well, apparently this is incorrect - I wouldn't expect it to retroactively apply, i'm just noobin it up at forum-quest because slow work day and lolz.

Clearly we need a Git repo of the rules so we can see the history of the changes.

[Sadiki]

Originally Posted by Rygar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Thread is rated 0/5 stars.

Rated it 1/5, I'm just not seeing it generating enough salt.

[Mead]

Originally Posted by Heebs13 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Look out folks, this guy is a real keyboard warrior.

Lhance gets sensitive when people speak to Sir Ken in a disrespectful manner