2 girls jump a 3rd till she has a seizure in McDonalds while employees laugh..

[wehrmacht]

Originally Posted by Nug [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You DO know what that means, right?

Are you out of your mind, there's nothing in there that supports money as the main cause of the 20 point IQ gap. The title of the article itself is:

Study claims IQ differences at least 50% genetic

Can you read that? *AT LEAST 50% GENETIC*. Nowhere does it say money is the main cause (as you claim). It says the exact opposite. Way to read something then claim it says the exact opposite of what it really does.

http://scienceblog.com/7669/study-cl...st-50-genetic/

[Nug]

Originally Posted by wehrmacht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Are you out of your mind, there's nothing in there that supports money as the main cause of the 20 point IQ gap. The title of the article itself is:

Socioeconomic - I don't think it means what you think it means.

Originally Posted by wehrmacht

Study claims IQ differences at least 50% genetic

Indeed it does say that. The study claims that IQ differences are at least 50% genetic. What's the other 50% comprised of?

Originally Posted by wehrmacht

Can you read that? *AT LEAST 50% GENETIC*. Nowhere does it say money is the main cause (as you claim). It says the exact opposite. Way to read something then claim it says the exact opposite of what it really does.

I don't think it means what youuuuu thiiiiiinnnnnk iiiiiitttt meeeeaaaans.

Money. ROFL.

Edit: Also, funny how you ignored my questions about anabolic steroids. Guess you gave up on that one.

[wehrmacht]

Originally Posted by Nug [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Indeed it does say that. The study claims that IQ differences are at least 50% genetic. What's the other 50% comprised of?

When someone says something is at least 50%, that means it's the main cause. Anything else would be a secondary contributor with less influence on the outcome obviously.

Therefore, you are agreeing that things like money (or whatever other variable you want to claim) is a secondary influence and not the main influence since you agree that's what the title says.

The end.

[Ennoia]

You're both fucking idiots and need a reading comprehension course.

[wehrmacht]

Originally Posted by Ennoia [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You're both fucking idiots and need a reading comprehension course.

You could also claim (with a 1:49 odds), that a secondary variable could be an equal contributor but by the way the article is worded, that's obviously not what they mean.

[Nug]

Originally Posted by Ennoia [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You're both fucking idiots and need a reading comprehension course.

Nice troll. Only an idiot would take the bait.

OH WAIT!

[Nug]

Originally Posted by wehrmacht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

When someone says something is at least 50%, that means it's the main cause. Anything else would be a secondary contributor with less influence on the outcome obviously.

Therefore, you are agreeing that things like money (or whatever other variable you want to claim) is a secondary influence and not the main influence since you agree that's what the title says.

The end.

Nice backpedaling. I don't feel you're worth the time to point out when you bit the bullet, but you did. Good show, chap.

[Mini14]

.

[Smedy]

Lol i was seriously expecting fat ass gangsta bitches ganging up one some poor white girl and that's exactly what i got, america fuck yeah

That's pretty fucked up.

[Burnesto]

There's a twist. The poor white girl is actually a guy!