So... How classic do you want it?

[Fammaden]

You rich fat cats with your big fancy expensive monitors make me SICK!

[soronil]

Originally Posted by Mblake81 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Hmm, here is a pic of 1600x1200 in window. I tried /viewport but it puts the image on the left side of my screen, is there a way to get it in the center?

The first two parameters to viewport are the starting X and Y. So if you want to nudge it over 100 pixels to the right, you would do:
/viewport 100 0 1600 1200

[Baler]

CRT monitors only

[Mblake81]

Originally Posted by soronil [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The first two parameters to viewport are the starting X and Y. So if you want to nudge it over 100 pixels to the right, you would do:
/viewport 100 0 1600 1200

I thank you. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Mblake81]

Originally Posted by Baler [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

CRT monitors only

No joke, if they refreshed CRT tech for computer grade monitors I would really consider buying one. Hopefully with weight and size reductions. They are the superior PC item beyond those two things.

[brussel]

My desktop resolution is 2560 x 1440.

If I want 4:3 with the black area off to the right would my viewport command be:
/viewport 0 0 1920 1440

I am struggling to see the benefits of using 4:3, the bit that is chopped off doesn't seem like a big deal to me.

Thank you.

[Chortles Snort|eS]

1680x1050 cut anything out? pls adviSe

[soronil]

Originally Posted by brussel [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I am struggling to see the benefits of using 4:3, the bit that is chopped off doesn't seem like a big deal to me.

Thank you.

Originally Posted by Chortles Snort|eS [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

1680x1050 cut anything out? pls adviSe

Think of it this way: if you are facing two trees, and those two tree are on the far left and far right edges of your screen, any viewport you have.. 4:3, wide, ultrawide, even a rediculous ultra narrow 1:2 it something, those trees will always be on the edges. The horizontal viewport is locked. But the more narrow the viewport, the more will be rendered vertically.

People play 16:9 and don't seem to mind. I think that's okay 3rd person. I still think 4:3 is better. But ultra wide is bad. And first person really benefits from 4:3

[Mblake81]

UI toggled off. Taken in the same spot.

1600x1200 4:3
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

2560x1440 16:9
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Mblake81]

4:3
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

16:9
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]