#231
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#232
|
||||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
| |||||
|
#233
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Green
Tofusin - Monk <Force of Will> Manowarr - Druid Blue Tofusin - 60 Monk <BDA> Shiroe - 60 Enchanter Manowarr - 60 Druid | |||
|
#234
|
|||
|
/shout "Forming NBG group for Frenzy. Looking for 5 casters/priests...."
| ||
|
#235
|
||||
|
Quote:
Certain camps will always be money camps. | |||
|
#236
|
||||
|
Quote:
If people want to be generous and pass, that is their individual discretion. Its what we ALWAYS do among friends and guildies. But saying everyone rolls, and everyone gets an equal chance, is greedy? An equal chance is greedy? Sorry no. That is what YOU are saying. That is illogical. NBG is appropriate among friends or guildies. Or for No Drop Items. | |||
|
#237
|
||||
|
Quote:
But you are right, any system the heavily weighs the chances of rewards in favor of only a portion of the group.... is inherently greedy. ASSUMING all included do not agree to those terms. Wanting an even chance at those rewards is EVEN. And far from greedy. | |||
|
#238
|
||||
|
Quote:
Scenario: If a group insists on NBG and we have a Warrior, Ranger, and Rogue in the group. A SSOY drops. All can potentially use the item, but I would argue that the Warrior should get first dibs if they insist on a nonsensical NBG rule. Ykesha proc generates a decent amount of aggro, and as such, that’s aggro I’d rather have the Warrior generating then the other two classes. (A rough example, but you see my point). So at what point do we progress from NBG to then ACTUAL need above others? Or let’s say one of them already has an SSOY, does that mean it’s less fair for that person to roll on it if the other two don’t have the item? Who makes the decision on this as we venture further and further down the rabbit hole? NBG, in addition to being unfair to other members in the group who participated, makes the choice of who DOES get to roll on an item much more convoluted. | |||
|
#239
|
||||
|
Quote:
But if Im grouping with an overtwinked A***ole who is looting every corpse like a mad man. While Im still wearing leather/banded. You can better believe Im going to roll on the valuable drop. In another example I saw a ranger who was wearing a crested helm at the entrance of Guk.... join my Exe/Sav group 2 hours later.... without a helmet. Now If I didnt recognize him, he would of gotten one over on our group. The problem if NBG is it removes individual discretion from the process. And as a blanket rule it can be used and exploited by greedy people. If the baseline is everyone rolls... nothing can be exploited. And I can decide to pass based on comparative equipment and actual need. Greedy people can exploit NGB Greedy people can not exploit when everyone rolls | |||
|
#240
|
|||
|
Six thieves break into a high security vault to steal a pair of earrings worth a billion dollars.
#1: "Hurray we are all rich!" #2: "Nope - my ears are pierced so I'm calling NBG." | ||
|
|
|