"We want people to obtain their levels naturally via kills" --Rogean

[Asteria]

Originally Posted by Asteria [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Manna, Maybe they just didn't want your AIDS signature growing with more self-fellatio like "1st level 60 on Green99."

[Castle2.0]

This thread so far.

Only quest exp exploit I can think of would be one that returns the turn-in item that can be turned in multiple times. I haven't seen that on P99, and that isn't the situation Rogean is referring to.

There is no exploit. Rogean used the word incredibly loosely.

For example, if someone stockpiles 15,000 greater lightstones, they can go 50-60 somewhat fast. Does that mean they exploited? Does that mean the quest is an exploit?

• Sleeper was not killed during the Velious era on any server, therefore the Sleeper on Green must be marked unkillable. We need to do this just in case some people find out how to kill him.
• Deleveling to 1 with Velious raid gear from VP was not a a widespread thing in classic. Therefore, if anyone does it on Green, they should be banned, or be level locked so you cannot attempt it.
• Selling COTH teleports with your mage COTH bot was not a common widespread thing in classic. We must disallow it.
• Open, server-wide raids was not a common widespread thing in classic. We must disallow it. Sorry, a few times, doesn't count.
• Guild mage bot armies at the very release of PoSky was not a common widespread thing in classic. We should have disallowed it.

I hope we can find more creative ideas to crush to make the server a generic uninteractive recreation of the average of all live servers during classic. Because... isn't that the goal?

Besides, it's not like 10-15 years after Sleeper was killed gamer magazines still wrote articles on how RZ killed him.

[Zekayy]

Originally Posted by Castle2.0 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This thread so far.

the only flaw in this is that the sleeper wasnt killed on p99 he was awakened theres a huge difference other than that I agree with you castle2.0

[Castle2.0]

My point is that according to this logic he should be tagged unkillable/invulnerable since he was not killed during the "classic timeline" of any server.

I know he hasn't been killed yet on P99. To stop him from being killed, they should make him unkillable. It's one more way to make sure nothing major that didn't happen in classic can happen on P99.

The P99 community might do something amazing, unite a bunch of players, create an incredible experience and a story worth telling. It would be absolutely terrible. So not classic.

[Ripqozko]

Originally Posted by Zekayy [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

the only flaw in this is that the sleeper wasnt killed on p99 he was awakened theres a huge difference other than that I agree with you castle2.0

i was there, sorry yall were not. Sorry you dont got warder loot. ill be glad to show you were we killed them if you want.

[strongNpretty]

Originally Posted by Ripqozko [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

i was there, sorry yall were not. Sorry you dont got warder loot. ill be glad to show you were we killed them if you want.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]