#11
|
||||
|
Quote:
i never played an ench on live so idk what their charm was like. as a bard tho that's what u enchanters get [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
__________________
pvp 2.0 pls
| |||
|
#13
|
|||
|
I do remember cha basically being useless for everything but lull resists as a live bard.
This is probably closer to real classic.
__________________
pvp 2.0 pls
| ||
|
#14
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#15
|
||||
|
Quote:
If your point is that I don't have proof of it being classic and should therefore not make assumptions about what is classic... I trust the devs. They seem to require a lot of evidence of something being classic before implementing it. And I do remember the bards over at the concert hall forums doing extensive research into both cha and dex to determine their worth for us bards. I'm sure the enchanters did too. The data must exist.
__________________
pvp 2.0 pls
| |||
|
#16
|
||||
|
Quote:
If you're going to take a break, my advice is this: Don't delete your characters, don't give your stuff away, save it for when you get the EQ itch again. P99's largest advantage is that it's always here, always in the same era, and you can come back after a year or two away and your character is just as good as it was when you parked it. Danth | |||
|
#17
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#18
|
|||
|
You have been Haynar'd!
LOADING PLEASE WAIT... | ||
|
#19
|
|||
|
ok
enchanters are already OP as shit anyways | ||
|
#20
|
||||
|
Quote:
Why are people freaking out so hard about this? We don't even know how the changes will actually play out in game. It's hard to imagine that enchanter charm would be made less viable than druid charm, and we know that druids rely much less on cha than enchanters (maybe not at all?).
__________________
pvp 2.0 pls
| |||
|
|
|