Joke 6 Committee "Hearing"

[Rainik Stormseeker]

Originally Posted by Botten [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You forgot something troll boy



Love that non-verification hearsay, But that is what you Trumptards are all about!

You mean like what the Sham 6 committee star "witness" Cassidy Hutchinson's testimony was been based on??

“She did not see it happen,” Tapper said to Raskin Tuesday evening. “Do you have any corroborating evidence? You have interviewed both Ornato, or the committee has interviewed both Engle and Ornato, two Secret Service agents. Do you have any corroborating evidence that that story is true or do you only have it from Cassidy Hutchinson?”...“Well, um, the story that she told is the evidence that I’m aware of, at least within her story, and I’ve not seen anything to contradict it,” Raskin answered. “And then, of course, it’s corroborated by everything else we know about Donald Trump’s eagerness to not just incite this march and assemble the march and form the march and exhort the people in the march but also to participate in it, he wanted to go into it.”

So her story corroborates her story LOL. Leftist circular reasoning 101.

PS Gotta love all that cross-examination.. oh wait.

[Botten]

Originally Posted by Rainik Stormseeker [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You mean like what the Sham 6 committee star "witness" Cassidy Hutchinson's testimony was been based on??

It stinks when GOP can’t interrupt or do what you are doing diverting to a conspiracy like all the other committees that had sham GOP joint investigation.

Love watching you Trumptard cry foul as Bannon is found guilt. While your followers lose their voting rights traveling back to their red home states (for getting jail time). Your party is humiliated by a stupid idiot dressed as a Shaman supporting a group of morons who thinks the ghost of JFK is going to make Trump president again.

Originally Posted by Rainik Stormseeker [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So her story corroborates her story LOL. Leftist circular reasoning 101.

The Committee left it open if more comes to their attention they can review it. And a bunch more cockroaches (er Republicans) are coming forward now to testify against Trump.

Originally Posted by Rainik Stormseeker [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

PS Gotta love all that cross-examination.. oh wait.

Yeah. Look up what ‘committee’ means. They are going to pass the ‘findings’ to the DoJ.

Like Horza said I find it amazing you Trumptard still don’t understand this isn’t a criminal court case.

[Reiwa]

Originally Posted by Botten [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Love watching you Trumptard cry foul as Bannon is found guilt.

To me, the idea that the new President can waive the executive privilege assertions of the old, is frankly, 'malarkey'.

[Rainik Stormseeker]

Originally Posted by Botten [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It stinks when GOP can’t interrupt

So cross-examination is called "interrupting" when you don't want it to happen? LOL

Originally Posted by Botten [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

or do what you are doing diverting to a conspiracy like all the other committees that had sham GOP joint investigation.

Don't be obtuse - you're not this stupid, but perhaps you are this lacking in integrity. You and I both know Nancy Pelosi REJECTED McCarthy's nominee's for the committee - first time in history if i recall - and SHE chose Cheney and Kizinger - both absolute RINO's and voted 2x to impeach.

Originally Posted by Botten [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

/insert word salad
Love watching you Trumptard cry foul as Bannon is found guilt. While your followers lose their voting rights traveling back to their red home states (for getting jail time). Your party is humiliated by a stupid idiot dressed as a Shaman supporting a group of morons who thinks the ghost of JFK is going to make Trump president again.

Originally Posted by Botten [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The Committee left it open if more comes to their attention they can review it. And a bunch more cockroaches (er Republicans) are coming forward now to testify against Trump.

OH except when it came to letting Bannon testify after Trump waived executive privilege, right? Steve Bannon agrees to testify before Jan. 6 committee


It's a sham, you turd. The contempt trial is an extension of that, but I shouldn't be surprised. Commies never have problems persecuting/imprisoning political dissidents.

Originally Posted by Botten [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yeah. Look up what ‘committee’ means. They are going to pass the ‘findings’ to the DoJ.

Are you really this dense?

Originally Posted by Botten [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Like Horza said I find it amazing you Trumptard still don’t understand this isn’t a criminal court case.

No one said it was. What we have said, is it's CORRUPT. Clearly.

Now PLEASE, tell me about Eric Holder and Lois Lerner.

[Botten]

Originally Posted by Rainik Stormseeker [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So cross-examination is called "interrupting" when you don't want it to happen? LOL

Cross examine allows someone to speak. During public congressional investigation committees during Trump Presidency were filled with Republicans talking over and interrupt those testifying. Democrats figured out how to stop their childish tactics and still got a bipartisan investigation. Sorry your party did not get the chance to make the proceedings like that of a Jerry Springer show; again.

Originally Posted by Rainik Stormseeker [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

OH except when it came to letting Bannon testify after [URL="https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-says-waive-executive-privilege-ahead-steve-bannons-jan-6-committ-rcna37505"]

Trumps executive order means NOTHING and BannonÂ’s own lawyers said he never even talked about it with them. He was guilty the end. Just another Republican found guilty.

And no one cares about your equivalent nothing burger Benghazi like tangent topics.

[Rainik Stormseeker]

Originally Posted by Botten [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Cross examine allows someone to speak. During public congressional investigation committees during Trump Presidency were filled with Republicans talking over and interrupt those testifying.

FFS you really are an imbecile. Do you actually know the legal context of cross-examination?

Originally Posted by Botten [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Democrats figured out how to stop their childish tactics and still got a bipartisan investigation.

If by "figured out" you mean deprived the minority speaker the right to select his own representatives to the committee, as had been customary forever, then OK. Just be honest, don't frame it like the Commicrats did something noble, or honorable.

Sorry your party did not get the chance to make the proceedings like that of a Jerry Springer show; again.

like the Democrats "reclaiming" their time?

Originally Posted by Botten [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Trumps executive order means NOTHING and BannonÂ’s own lawyers said he never even talked about it with them. He was guilty the end. Just another Republican found guilty.

It wasn't an executive order, you troglodyte, it was him invoking Executive privilege, just like Obama did for Fast and Furious to shield Eric Holder, which wasn't 'settled' until 2019., except that crimes were actually committed then, and you know, running firearms to Mexican cartels so they can use them against civilians and border agents, is pretty shitty, wouldn't you say?

Originally Posted by Botten [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

And no one cares about your equivalent nothing burger Benghazi like tangent topics.

Wow, you must have been smoking crack out of Hunter Biden's asshole again.

[Botten]

Originally Posted by Rainik Stormseeker [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

FFS you really are an imbecile. Do you actually know the legal context of cross-examination?

Oh look he says he knows the committee has nothing to due with criminal but wants a 'legal' cross-examine.

What an idiot.

Originally Posted by Rainik Stormseeker [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If by "figured out" you mean deprived the minority speaker the right to select his own representatives to the committee, as had been customary forever, then OK. Just be honest, don't frame it like the Commicrats did something noble, or honorable.

Moron they were taking orders from McCarthy

And it didn't matter it still is a bipartisan investigation stop your crying.

Originally Posted by Rainik Stormseeker [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

like the Democrats "reclaiming" their time?

You comparing talking over a person testifying with nonsense and conspiracies to following procedure?
Ha you are dumb.

Originally Posted by Rainik Stormseeker [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It wasn't an executive order, you troglodyte, it was him invoking Executive privilege, just like Obama did for Fast and Furious to shield Eric Holder, which wasn't 'settled' until 2019. - blah tangent tangent tangent

Well great then by your own admittance all ironed out. Trump's executive order meant nothing. Still didn't go your way? cry more.

Sorry you worship a party who in 28 years (even before trump) has been known for its corrupt and scandalous GOP Admins: 100+ indictments 100+ convictions and 30+ jail sentences.

[Reiwa]

Originally Posted by Rainik Stormseeker [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It wasn't an executive order, you troglodyte, it was him invoking Executive privilege

This is correct. They convicted him despite Tromp waiving the EP and allowing him to testify prior to the trial, which he agreed to. It's garbage.

Originally Posted by Botten [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Cross examine allows someone to speak. During public congressional investigation committees during Trump Presidency were filled with Republicans talking over and interrupt those testifying. Democrats figured out how to stop their childish tactics and still got a bipartisan investigation. Sorry your party did not get the chance to make the proceedings like that of a Jerry Springer show; again.

This is a terrible practice for a body that can refer charges for prosecution.

[Botten]

Originally Posted by Reiwa [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This is correct. They convicted him despite Tromp waiving the EP and allowing him to testify prior to the trial, which he agreed to. It's garbage.

Garbage? Explain… even ignoring Rain’s insist on talking about privilege to my discussion on order.

Mr. Bannon's tenure as a White House employee ended in 2017

The committee could assuredly still request Bannon to discuss event before Jan 6 2020 while ignoring the time before his tenure. Still making it illegal for Bannon refuse the request.

Conversations with the president after his tenure were not off limit.

Plus

Released on 10/8/2021
And even if the committee was "inclined to accept the unsupported premise" that executive privilege reaches communications between Bannon and Trump, the letter notes that Bannon "does not enjoy any form of absolute immunity from testifying or producing documents in response to a Congressional subpoena."

Announced on 10/18/2021
January 6 committee rejects Bannon's executive privilege claim

Followed up by President Biden saying on 10/26/2021
He Disallowed executive privilege from the previous president being allowed.
This is Biden’s right
”The power of the Executive Branch is vested in the President of the United States“ (note not from Wikipedia)