Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
It doesn't hurt me at all, and you haven't read the data since you think it is 50% [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I am not sure why you think misquoting my posts is helping your case.
I am pretty sure it is the other way around. You don't like seeing a Mage deal less DPS than you thought.
|
The initial data you posted had shaman at like 55 and mage at 82. You kept spouting off about how it's "only 27 dps difference and dps doesn't matter when we're talking about mage dps but look how much dps my shaman does cause dps matters. Watch me root rot adds in an xp grp like a retard cause doing dps as a shaman is very important" and when I pointed out the fact that using your own numbers mage is literally 50% more dps than shaman you went and tweaked your data to show something different. Was your data wrong then? Is it wrong now? Did you really think I didn't notice?