![]() |
|
#1791
|
||||
|
Quote:
I have provided better evidence than you have. There is no way to prove the DPS data you provided matches your standards, so you need to provide better data first.
__________________
| |||
|
#1792
|
||||
|
Quote:
Any second now, someone is going to come through this thread and vouch for this "poor man". He clearly has the best intentions for being here, right? | |||
|
#1793
|
||||
|
Quote:
I was not the one trying to argue groups are chain pulling indefinitely.
__________________
| |||
|
#1794
|
|||
|
UCF +DSM had to be the worst combo of guildies ever, the data proves it.
| ||
|
#1795
|
|||
|
DSM you can’t even appropriately interpret the data you’ve been given. The only “data” you provided was you solo root dotting a lv 40 jin frog and then you solo root dotting one zone in golem. Beyond that it’s broken napkin math.
You have provided precisely zero actual real life data/evidence of how much damage your shaman could do in a fast killing group competing with the relative dps of 2 hasted quadding enchanter pets. I gave you real life samplings of myself with a tunare equipped monk, a raid geared sk, an epic mage and at times we had it a charmed enchanter pet all competing for finite damage per mob before it was dead. In some cases we had mobs dead before you could realistically land your third ice strike if chain cast as soon as tank engaged. Mage pets are strong dps. I doubt you would be able to sustainably keep up with just the pet nevermind my own nukes.
__________________
| ||
|
#1796
|
|||
|
20 more pages to go!
__________________
| ||
|
#1797
|
||||
|
Quote:
If your group is killing mobs on an average of 36 seconds, you can easily determine how many nukes you can cast per encounter, and average DPS of pets. My data is video evidence with logs you can cross reference. Your data is screenshots of a parser you keep claiming isn't correct for some reason.
__________________
| |||
|
#1798
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
| |||
|
#1799
|
|||
|
You need to provide better data first. But you won't, because you know it will just show the same math I have been providing.
__________________
| ||
![]() |
|
|