Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 03-29-2010, 07:17 AM
Uaellaen Uaellaen is offline
Planar Protector

Uaellaen's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Munich, Germany
Posts: 1,161
Default

grats! =D
__________________
[60 High Priest] Uuaellaen (Dark Elf)
[55 Conjurer] Uaellaen (Dark Elf)
[24 Rogue] Uaellaenn (Dark Elf) *retired*
  #42  
Old 03-29-2010, 07:29 AM
Madbart Madbart is offline
Scrawny Gnoll


Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: fl
Posts: 20
Default

Clayton ... Why all the hate?

Can't you just let Divinity have a moment to enjoy the kill?

Does numbers really matter here or the fact that Divinity downed Vox?

Time to find something else to hate. Leave it be.
  #43  
Old 03-29-2010, 07:54 AM
guineapig guineapig is offline
Planar Protector

guineapig's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 4,028
Default

Hey Clayton, you know that 38 people in the zone included a bunch of IB, like 3 Fishbait, Abacab (Trans), and a GM as well, right?
(Oh, and I'm guessing we should count you too.)

And if your mad about the picture, don't blame us, that's Abacab's screenshot and this is his thread you are shitting up.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by nilbog View Post
Server chat is for civil conversation. Personal attacks/generally being confrontational will not be tolerated.
Last edited by guineapig; 03-29-2010 at 08:01 AM..
  #44  
Old 03-29-2010, 08:56 AM
Taminy Taminy is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 249
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by guineapig [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Hey Clayton, you know that 38 people in the zone included a bunch of IB, like 3 Fishbait, Abacab (Trans), and a GM as well, right?
(Oh, and I'm guessing we should count you too.)

And if your mad about the picture, don't blame us, that's Abacab's screenshot and this is his thread you are shitting up.
I think they did /who divinity chic. I'm pretty sure we had 38 or close to it.

I was able to count 35 in the pic. I think 2 or 3 people were running late and may not have made it all the way to Vox but I'm not sure.

That said, the zerg statement doesn't really hold water. We lost a couple of enchanters early (overzealous mana sieve or tash aggro I assume) and a mage I think due to the TT add/train. It's not like we went in with 38 and had 5 left by the time the fight was over.

And we had 38 show up so what were we supposed to do? Tell some to log off so we could get a bigger epeen?
  #45  
Old 03-29-2010, 09:32 AM
Zordana Zordana is offline
Fire Giant

Zordana's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Munich, Germany
Posts: 654
Default

this is so unbelieveable, all the QQ: SHUT THE HELL UP AND LEAVE THIS FORUM ALONE!! LEAVE IT ALONE!!! ALL YOU PEOPLE CARE ABOUT IS MAKING JOKES OUT OF IT!! LEAVE FORUM ALOOHOHOONE BUHUHUHUHU!!!

cant you just enjoy anything else than ranting on every friggn post? i could make a serious post that someone died, and the dark funny people would be like "what did he drop?" uh god that would start a rant festivel... actually it doesnt really matter WHAT you write, people here make a rant fest out of everything.. and this is kinda sad..
the only board you can look at without gettin a headache is the EC TUNNEL forum.. sad but true!
__________________


[50 Warrior] Rumzuck Umbatsch (Ogre) <Remedy>
[34 Druid] Vito Corleone (Wood Elf) <Europa>
[35 Necromancer] Torak (Dark Elf) <Europa>
[13 Shadow Knight] Rumzerg (Dark Elf) <Europa>

EQEmuLauncher
Have your files up to date, switch between servers nice and easy, and more!
http://moestaverne.com/

  #46  
Old 03-29-2010, 09:37 AM
Trimm Trimm is offline
Sarnak

Trimm's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 468
Send a message via AIM to Trimm
Default

It was a guild-first kill and people were excited. A lot of people wanted to be there. Simple as that. Last I checked, we had 36 (2 came very late I think?) and IB had 31. So what? Had we failed, and IB killed her, are they a zerg too? We had 30 minutes to assemble and get our first shot a Vox, so people showed up to be a part of it.

Nice troll though, It's amazing that people can find something negative in any situation.
__________________
Trimm Rockgroin 59 Rogue
Trimman Vintersorg 52 Shaman

Quote:
Originally Posted by nilbog View Post
Cats on the moon not happening on my watch.
  #47  
Old 03-29-2010, 09:51 AM
Ferok Ferok is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 521
Send a message via AIM to Ferok
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Taminy [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
That said, the zerg statement doesn't really hold water. We lost a couple of enchanters early (overzealous mana sieve or tash aggro I assume) and a mage I think due to the TT add/train. It's not like we went in with 38 and had 5 left by the time the fight was over.

And we had 38 show up so what were we supposed to do? Tell some to log off so we could get a bigger epeen?
This.

Calling it a zerg because of the number of players that showed up is just ridiculous. Call it a zerg, rather, based on the number of players who died.

Handful of deaths on an AOE dragon != zerg.

Grats Divinity.
  #48  
Old 03-29-2010, 09:55 AM
Rhalous Rhalous is offline
Kobold

Rhalous's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: New Orleans, La
Posts: 155
Default

The immature negativity of some of these posts is ridiculous. You have no idea what Divinity is about, obviously. I knew some people would be upset that we killed Vox, but guess what? This wasn't about you. It was about us and we don't really care what anyone else thinks.


Edit: Just wanted to thank the ones with positive posts.
  #49  
Old 03-29-2010, 10:01 AM
ammut ammut is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 123
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brut [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I see Ammutt in there! If he's at Perma, who was camping lord?!
WHAT IS HAPPENING SOMEBODY EXPLAIN!

And grats. Good stuff, saw oodles and oodles of Divinity popping up at NK some day or two back, and figured something was going. Me loyal ogre scouts stationed in Perma reported folks parking there. =X
Transient was. That ugly bastish got a yak!
  #50  
Old 03-29-2010, 10:01 AM
Wrei Wrei is offline
Sarnak

Wrei's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 205
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Humerox [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Make that less than 5 missing. If you're implying huge zerg, not so. And she went down without even 1 CH. Flawless execution from great leadership.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Look, All Clayton was pointing out was that there WAS 38 at the kill. There's nothing to be ashamed on downing Vox with 38, but the fact is some of your guildies tried to deny this (by either not knowing the facts or out of pride). That being said it's totally understandable since it would be even more retarded to number cap yourselves for the sake of proving something.

I'm very happy that you guys managed to down her, just unhappy as to how you got to attempt her. Where is the competitive spirit of racing to a mob? I'd hate to toss mud again in Trans's direction but this whole "if we can't race 'em camp 'em" mentality is just extremely lame.

After the whole rotation fiasco, rules were established to "allow" competitive racing. Players however are trying to bend this rule by flatly camping a boss. This is the part where I lose all respect to any camping raiding guilds. I mean why bother with the first to mobilize AFTER a boss spawns rule if your going to be sitting there WITH a 72 HOUR WINDOW?

All that camping for manastone wasn't enough? Is this the next evolution? Let's get random 15 players to sit for a cloak of flames? Isn't it easier and more efficient to setup a tracking rotation and allow the rest of your guildies to go on their lives and be summoned when needed? This is where it baffles me when people accuse us of being "too" hardcore. Seriously, I may be dedicated enough to log on when texted (while not being busy in RL) but to sit there online and willling to wait 72 hours for a Dragon to pop is a whole new level of "hardcore".

If responding to a call of logging on is half retarded then camping a boss is fully retarded. I'm dying to get out of this limited content cluster fuck, Sky will see to that more or less until Kunark comes out. So no I'm not all butt hurt about Div getting Vox, losing bosses to competing guild was a reality waiting to happen. It's just the manner of how we lost is what bothers me and how the future raiding guild will evolve.

This btw isn't an "IB" only issue but something all raiding guilds need to consider. Is mass zerg recruiting and having 15 players in all boss zones 24/7 the next step in raid evolution? Are we going to be doing camp check for bosses in OOC? You might think this is an exaggeration but I can see how all this could unfold within the next 3months or so. My stance is to discourage camping, having boss mobs being reduced to a camp check just doesn't seem right in so many levels. I don't have answers to 'fix' this issue, the only thing I can think of is to REALLY increase the time variance to such a retarded extent that camping would not be viable (that would mean less bosses for the whole server).

So don't think of this post as being all bitter over losing a dragon. I'm happy for Divinity (those that know me online know I'm a reasonable guy). The zerg doesn't bother me, the camp certainly does. I've said my piece so troll away.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:47 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.