What ruleset for next server?

[ruru2a]

basic are for pink panthere....

[Coridan]

How about the Legends server ruleset? Where we force the GMs to actually do GM events

[Rodcet]

I’d actually really like a Firiona Vie style server.

[Poisson]

Rallos Zek rules are far more interresting. At least, some challenge and less problems about claiming camps or not.

[Toxigen]

racial pvp lol

[Encroaching Death]

Originally Posted by Toxigen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

racial pvp lol

Humans vs All

[Jimjam]

Originally Posted by Poisson [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Rallos Zek rules are far more interresting. At least, some challenge and less problems about claiming camps or not.

Completely disagree. RZ style is thrown around as this magical cure all for camp disputes, but it really isn’t.

The pvp range is, understandably, tiny. Sure, it ensures ‘fair’ 1v1s, but it also means many times you won’t be able to solve disputes with pvp. Groups often have a wider spread of levels and it leaves players unable to effectively contribute against aggressors / non sharers in their dispute.

The logical conclusion is completely open pvp, with nonteam or level restrictions. The closest server to this was discord.

Discord was effective at keeping pvp relevant with the mix of accelerated xp, permadeath, lack of expansion bloat and the 1 month lifetime of the server combined with lack of range to pvp. It was the only true pvp server.

[pink grapefruit]

Originally Posted by Toxigen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

racial pvp lol

it's a lot of fun when it's elves vs. dwarves. stop being a gross mean person.

Originally Posted by Jimjam [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Completely disagree. RZ style is thrown around as this magical cure all for camp disputes, but it really isn’t.

The pvp range is, understandably, tiny. Sure, it ensures ‘fair’ 1v1s, but it also means many times you won’t be able to solve disputes with pvp. Groups often have a wider spread of levels and it leaves players unable to effectively contribute against aggressors / non sharers in their dispute.

The logical conclusion is completely open pvp, with nonteam or level restrictions. The closest server to this was discord.

Discord was effective at keeping pvp relevant with the mix of accelerated xp, permadeath, lack of expansion bloat and the 1 month lifetime of the server combined with lack of range to pvp. It was the only true pvp server.

the actual RZ server was so interesting to me. it was never my main server but i had characters there and played a tiny bit. the item loot and actual risk of losing worthwhile gear from pvp made it, from my perspective, an anti-pvp server. like most of the serious players identified themselves as "anti-PKs" and they did what they could to come to non-pvp solutions in most instances.

seeing what people did on the various servers when given more ways to interact with each other is what made me fall in love with pvp tbh.

[Toxigen]

also 2/10 no bush/towers option

[Ennewi]

https://web.archive.org/web/20030416...firionavie.jsp