Shadowknight > Warrior?

[CPTMULLER]

Whoa whoa whoa, Warriors are plenty of fun, jerk.

[Hildatoon]

I've always enjoyed playing a warrior. As long as you max out your taunt , kick and slam/bash you should be able to keep agro. Now there are always those chain casters or rogues that pop bs every chance they get but over all a well played war. with good gear should do fine. Just rememeber a fast weapon is a good thing.

[Crone]

Originally Posted by Hildatoon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Just rememeber a fast weapon is a good thing.

I think this is why I was able to hold aggro better than I thought. I was dual wielding 19 delay weapons.

[twizztid]

Depends on what you're doing. SK is pretty decent, and if you're in a tricky zone, SK FD pull / invis is really efficient. There are alot of stuff to consider.

[Darian]

Originally Posted by Taminy [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

SK: Better aggro, better utility/self sufficiency

Warrior: Better at taking damage (hp/ac/defensive), better dps.

/shrug really comes down to your play style.

Really? I would think SK spells/2hs/44 necro pet at lvl 60 would out-dps a warrior- is there something I'm missing?

[Omnimorph]

Originally Posted by Darian [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Really? I would think SK spells/2hs/44 necro pet at lvl 60 would out-dps a warrior- is there something I'm missing?

Warriors definitely out damage SK's in the higher end game. Simply because 1 handers do more dps than 2. Not sure exactly what expansion it is that they become much better dps, but thinking about SoD / BoC / primal, i imagine their dps there might be better than SK's. so Possibly velious.

[Isildur]

Warriors will always be better in a raid setting (in my opinion and experience). Yeah in UGuk fuck em', grab the SK. Once they're well geared and have two yaks, it's no question.