Best 4 person all caster/priest group

[Ripqozko]

Originally Posted by Fragged [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

4 Shadow Knights.

3 of them meditate while the last one chain casts level 4 necro spells until OOM. Rotate one by one for INFINITE level 4 necro spells.

This SK meta is where i want to be, only DESK allowed

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Fragged [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

4 Shadow Knights.

3 of them meditate while the last one chain casts level 4 necro spells until OOM. Rotate one by one for INFINITE level 4 necro spells.

I think you are on to something here. Fill all your bags with bone chips and take turns summoning pets. Mages aren't the only ones who can chain pets now!

[fortior]

Originally Posted by Crede [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

He’s just a troll that tries harder than most trolls when he’s lost an argument.

He's not a troll, he's been like this for literal years

[Gloomlord]

Originally Posted by fortior [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

He's not a troll, he's been like this for literal years

If so, he resorts to tactics likened to a troll when he can't concede.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Gloomlord [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If so, he resorts to tactics likened to a troll when he can't concede.

You have no proof for this claim. On the other hand, it is trivial to see actual troll behavior here from a lot of posters, including yourself. Your post history has no evidence for your claims, most of your posts are insults.

It is not troll behavior to ask people for evidence when they make a claim. It IS troll behavior to keep asking a person providing evidence to prove their evidence is valid. That is https://www.txst.edu/philosophy/reso...Ignorance.html - An appeal to ignorance. The proper way is to provide counter-evidence that disproves the evidence provided. Thus far, nobody has been willing or able to do so.

[Gloomlord]

When you bring the idea of "proof" into something like this, then it should be clear you're guilty as sin. It's like a criminal saying "you ain't got nothing on me and you know it".

Isn't it time you left this thread, already? You could have spent all this time and energy arguing on another forum for making a better world rather than Shaman being better in a hypothetical group where they're completely redundant.

Not even lying when I say this is depressing.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Gloomlord [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

When you bring the idea of "proof" into something like this, then it should be clear you're guilty as sin. It's like a criminal saying "you ain't got nothing on me and you know it".

Isn't it time you left this thread, already? You could have spent all this time and energy arguing on another forum for making a better world rather than Shaman being better in a hypothetical group where they're completely redundant.

Not even lying when I say this is depressing.

The only thing that is depressing is your idea that you don't need evidence to prove a claim.

I am not sure why you think you can simply say "I am right", and expect people to comply.

Your analogy to the legal system doesn't really make sense. A verdict in a legal trial is not the same thing as the truth. A person can be convicted of a crime when they are innocent, and vice versa. The truth doesn't change based on the verdict.

[Gloomlord]

You're not as clever as you think you are. Read what I typed again...

The criminal in this cliche is bragging to the police or someone else that he's guilty as sin, but since noone has physical proof, he'll get off free.

Wasn't that obvious?

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Gloomlord [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You're not as clever as you think you are. Read what I typed again...

The criminal in this cliche is bragging to the police or someone else that he's guilty as sin, but since noone has physical proof, he'll get off free.

Wasn't that obvious?

It was obvious, and my response is the correct one for that kind of analogy.

The issue here is you are making the assumption that I am guilty and bragging that you cannot prove I am guilty. I chose to ignore that part, because it is silly lol.

You are making a claim about me being guilty and bragging about it, with no evidence to back it up.

[Gloomlord]

Didn't seem obvious to you if you talked about a court verdict, rather than the fact it's someone bragging about lack of evidence. You embarrass yourself constantly in some desperate attempt to seem more clever than you actually are.

I mean, how can one procure "proof" that you resort to sophistry? It's just an opinion, just like you calling most people and myself "trolls" for giving you disparaging remarks is an opinion.