shaman duo

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Gloomlord [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Ah, so then why are you bothering to respond to me?

I'm just an "angry troll", yet you decide to engage with me? Could it actually be that you know I'm right and that you need convince yourself otherwise?

The only one you can convince is yourself at this point, because noone else is buying your nonsense.

It's really quite simple. I don't have a grudge against anyone on these forums, including yourself.

I am confident you can fix your anger management issues if you realize you have them. You can keep insulting me if you want, but you aren't going to accomplish whatever goal you think you are trying to achieve by exclusively trolling and insulting people. The only thing you are doing is looking like an asshole.

[Troxx]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Gloomlord]

You can't have it both ways...

You can't say Troxx and I are trolling for the mere sake of it, then decide to engage with us. That reveals you're a liar who keeps the flames going for either your amusement or to save face because you know you look foolish.

You know I've checkmated you here.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Gloomlord [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You can't have it both ways...

You can't say Troxx and I are trolling for the mere sake of it, then decide to engage with us. That reveals you're a liar who keeps the flames going for either your amusement or to save face because you know you look foolish.

You know I've checkmated you here.

I certainly can have it both ways, and I do!

Your strange ideas of what people "must" do are simply delusions. I don't have to follow whatever nonsensical ideas you have in your head.

Please fix your anger management issues so you can be a positive poster here.

[Gloomlord]

You can't have it both ways in a logical sense, because you're contradicting yourself.

I can't claim someone is an angry arsehole whilst I go completely out of my way to annoy them and exacerbate the situation.

Read what I'm writing before you childishly reply "I can have it both ways!".

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Gloomlord [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You can't have it both ways in a logical sense, because you're contradicting yourself.

I can't claim someone is an angry arsehole whilst I go completely out of my way to annoy them and exacerbate the situation.

Read what I'm writing before you childishly reply "I can have it both ways!".

The problem is you assume people must operate in specific ways, and there is no grey area. Your "logic" is deeply flawed. This may be why you keep talking in circles. You cannot seem to understand that people can operate outside of the assumptions within your head.

[Gloomlord]

Of course you can continue to act like a hypocrite without seeing the logic. Not saying you can't.

It's just indicating to us you are indeed a pathetic person who can't admit you're incorrect.

How on earth could you misinterpret what I mean with "you can't have it both ways"?

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Gloomlord [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Of course you can continue to act like a hypocrite without seeing the logic. Not saying you can't.

It's just indicating to us you are indeed a pathetic person who can't admit you're incorrect.

How on earth could you misinterpret what I mean with "you can't have it both ways"?

I didnt misinterpret it. I simply disagree with your flawed logic that " if a person does X, it must be for Y reason!". That is a nonsensical idea.

[Gloomlord]

Are you aware of what the word "hypocrisy" means?

You're a "smart" man. I'm sure you can figure it out. It has nothing to do with "if a person does X, it must be for Y reason", but we already knew that.

Regardless, you know you've been checkmated here. I'm sorry you lack the humility to admit defeat.

Anyone else want to try reasoning with this creature?

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Gloomlord [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Are you aware of what the word "hypocrisy" means?

You're a "smart" man. I'm sure you can figure it out. It has nothing to do with "if a person does X, it must be for Y reason", but we already knew that.

Regardless, you know you've been checkmated here. I'm sorry you lack the humility to admit defeat.

Anyone else want to try reasoning with this creature?

Yes, I know what hypocrisy means. You clearly do not, because you seem to think it is hypocritical to engage with an obvious troll such as yourself.

I disagree with that idea, and I believe this is why you keep acting like a fool on these forums. You have a very rigid ideology, where if a person does a specific action, it can only be for a specific reason. You ignore the complexity of human behavior.

I can indeed engage with an obvious troll such as yourself in an attempt to get you to see reason. Is it futile? Probably. Do I care that it is probably futile? No. I think you can redeem yourself, and I hope that you do!