Best 4 person all caster/priest group

[Keebz]

Your definition of pocket character not agreed upon by anyone. But for arguments sake I have personally leveled multiple shaman bots to 60, so you are also wrong there.

But yes, pocket characters are irrelevant to this discussion.

[Zuranthium]

Someone please buy a pocket pussy (mini size) for DSM so he can finally have something else to do. There have to be more interesting threads to create after 2 years.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Keebz [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Your definition of pocket character not agreed upon by anyone. But for arguments sake I have personally leveled multiple shaman bots to 60, so you are also wrong there.

But yes, pocket characters are irrelevant to this discussion.

Guild bots are a bit different from pocket characters, as you have DKP incentives to level them. The community agrees with my definition of pocket character, as my definition describes the practice of pocket characters. It has been this way for years.

Are you claiming people don't make level 55 mages for cothing, as an example? They are all leveled to 60?

If you want to claim pocket characters are irrelevant to the topic, rebut this post:

https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...postcount=5531

[Troxx]

DSM’s rationale is clear. Shamans need pocket clerics so pocket clerics should be allowed even though everyone else disagrees with respect to this thought experiment.

Meanwhile clerics don’t need pocket shamans at all to be successful in all environments within the scope of this thought experiment.

Very sound logic.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

DSM’s rationale is clear. Shamans need pocket clerics so pocket clerics should be allowed even though everyone else disagrees with respect to this thought experiment.

Meanwhile clerics don’t need pocket shamans at all to be successful in all environments within the scope of this thought experiment.

Very sound logic.

Troxx continues to troll by strawmanning what I've said.

Troxx is ignoring Vaniki, where a lone Cleric would not work, and Malo/Shaman Slow/Torpor would help more than a second Cleric.

Troxx continues to dodge this post, which disproves his claim that pocket characters are not allowed in this thread, using his own logic:

https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...postcount=5531

Troxx is also denying reality, as people make and use pocket characters regularly.

[Toxigen]

Troxx will you please stop denying reality on elfsim forums?

thanks

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Toxigen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Troxx will you please stop denying reality on elfsim forums?

thanks

Thank you. These forums are designed for people to get answers to questions about the game. Troxx can go to RnF when we wants to spam threads with nonsense. This is not the place for that.

[Toxigen]

pot, meet kettle

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Toxigen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

pot, meet kettle

Yourself and Troxx are the ones who necro this thread to spout more nonsense. As I said, I never start this.

Trox, meet Tox indeed.

[Snaggles]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Troxx is ignoring Vaniki, where a lone Cleric would not work, and Malo/Shaman Slow/Torpor would help more than a second Cleric.

Done a lot of 4-person Vaniki kills?

500+ pages later these four friends are being signed up for the death row of p99 camps…