Best 4 person all caster/priest group

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Toxigen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

There's a massive difference between having a mule to hold items in EC vs. actively parking a 5th char for a group to aid in combat effectiveness / recovery.

So you agree the group can have outside assistance now? Mules are characters that are not the four man characters, and provide outside assistance.

Originally Posted by Toxigen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Your inability to make that distinction is mind boggling.

I understand the difference just fine. I even provided definitions earlier in the thread. You are the one who claimed "no outside assistance". Mules are outside assistance. We were not discussing the differences between the two.

[Toxigen]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So you agree the group can have outside assistance now?

jesus fucking christ bro

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Toxigen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

jesus fucking christ bro

Indeed. First you claim zero outside assistance, then you backtrack and claim mules are ok.

All while forgetting more people on p99 play with pocket characters than disagree about pocket characters in this thread.

You'll support pocket characters outside this thread too.

The reality is people interested in this thread will just make the four man group they were convinced by, and create mules/pocket characters. They do that already.

[Vear99]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Follow your own advice and provide something yourself. You are new to these forums and this thread.

I have actually been checking this thread off and on for some time; it's been interesting and entertaining. I only posted because it seemed like you and Troxx might have finally resolved to settle your differences a few days ago, and test groups seems like the obvious way to do so. But if you are enjoying sparring on the forums, I am not going to stand in your way. Godspeed sir!

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Vear99 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I have actually been checking this thread off and on for some time; it's been interesting and entertaining. I only posted because it seemed like you and Troxx might have finally resolved to settle your differences a few days ago, and test groups seems like the obvious way to do so. But if you are enjoying sparring on the forums, I am not going to stand in your way. Godspeed sir!

I agree that the side supporting Clerics should provide some evidence for once. Thus far I have provided most of the evidence in this thread. Troxx with a test group would be a great start.

[Troxx]

Originally Posted by Toxigen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

maybe if DSM posts 2000 times in this thread someone will be convinced

He is above 1800 posts now … won’t be too long at this point

[Zuranthium]

What 4-person group with a "pocket Cleric" is DSM even trying to argue as the best? Enchanter, Enchanter, Shaman, and....???

[Penish]

I would like to point DSM to the DSM-5, please look under; Disruptive, Impulse-Control, and Conduct Disorders

also lol

[Toxigen]

everything in absolutes with this spergonaut

[bcbrown]

Originally Posted by Zuranthium [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

What 4-person group with a "pocket Cleric" is DSM even trying to argue as the best? Enchanter, Enchanter, Shaman, and....???

Yeah, I'd like to hear him restate his opinion on the group composition. I'm still at enc/enc/clr, with either a druid if it's a new server or the group wants self-sufficient mobility, or a necro if not.