Gearing a ranger

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by bcbrown [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Ah, I was mistakenly looking at the last column on the Lucy chart, but that's level 65 not 60. Now it makes sense. I agree with you that this is the right approach for getting ballpark ideas on comparing weapons.


It's been a few months since that discussion, so I'm revisiting your analysis and data and it looks like it's flawed from the very start. I'm using this post for the raw data: https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...&postcount=402, where you say:



Given the data in the spoiler tags, I think you messed up the basic counts. For IFS on giants I get the same damage figures, but I count 123 punches and 183 crushes, not 207 and 297. Similarly on the 1h parse, I also calculate 16712 total damage, but 469 punches and 213 crushes, not 730 and 305.

Could you recheck your figures?

I didn't include the misses in the logs to make it easier for people to double check the damage numbers. This is why I said "swings" instead of hits. My numbers include the misses.

I would advise you look at the post as a whole first, instead of fixating on trying to disprove specific details like this. You tend to do that a lot, and miss the forest for the trees. I don't mind constructive critisism, it helps hone my argument. But you have a bias towards me that tends to cloud your ability to read my posts, and it just wastes everybody's time.

[bcbrown]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I didn't include the misses in the logs to make it easier for people to double check the damage numbers. This is why I said "swings" instead of hits. My numbers include the misses.

Great, that makes sense. I'm just trying to make sense of your math. With that addition then is my little spreadsheet an accurate summary of your raw data?

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by bcbrown [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Great, that makes sense. I'm just trying to make sense of your math. With that addition then is my little spreadsheet an accurate summary of your raw data?

I'm not going to engage with you until you read the entire post first. I will not continue to enable your pattern of assuming everybody is wrong, and using any mistake you hope to find as justification for thinking this. You won't learn the game this way. You are supposedly good at math, read the post and think about it.

https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...&postcount=440