Question: Chardok named camping policy.

[Goregasmic]

Originally Posted by Tewaz [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You wouldn't have had a problem if you responded to the CC

I did and I got there shortly after. My main gripe was the mob was possibly engaged after I answered the CC but I understood I got there too late to legitimately contest the decision.

[Danth]

Calling camps when not physically at or near said camp is its own can of worms. If I zone in somewhere and something's open and I get into combat, some guy walks along and claims it was "his," how am I supposed to know whether he was really working the camp vs. him being full of crap? I've seen people try pulling that even in zones that had been entirely empty except for myself for over half an hour. I've seen players or even groups claim camps they weren't at and never even reached over periods of hours.

In general P99's rulebook suffers from 15 years of bloat, exceptions, and sometimes contradictory rulings. GM Medris is making a clean-up effort, so hopefully it can proceed and slim things down to more manageable levels. A completely new, current P99 camp rules post not compromised by a decade-plus of revisions and edits would be most welcome.

[Zuranthium]

Originally Posted by Danth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

In general P99's rulebook suffers from 15 years of bloat, exceptions, and sometimes contradictory rulings.

Instantly solved by going with the 1999 rules - whoever does the most DPS wins.

It's wild how the subscription version of EQ went back to that policy, reducing the work their employees have to do, while the volunteer classic version of the game has always ignored the classic ruleset and created far more headache for their staff.