The absolute state of AI results.

[shovelquest]

Originally Posted by Ekco [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Did you just go full Karen and ask to speak to the LLMs manager?

Lol

No it's just a very funny image.

But in an age where ai can't even not hallucinate how to use its own website, I would certainly prefer to talk to a human from my own country, who uses the same websites I do.

[arvidez]

using AI to generate dream interpretation. without prompting, just typing in dream, you get an interpretation much like a horoscope. the positive spin on the symbols so as not to offend you. do that to feel good. then ask for a critical, or not-sugar-coated interpretation.

“Even a seemingly trivial remark by another person may call forth an association that sheds light on a dream." could AI stand in as person in this quote?

[Reiwa]

AI is being unhelpful today.

I wanted to ask if you can deduct a vacacant rental property from your taxes and it's giving me the evasive dickhead technicalities runaround.

I think you can.

[sammoHung]

Today I got Chat GPT to admit that "artificial intelligence" is just a marketing term, and requires the meaning of the word "intelligence" being stretched so far it loses explanatory value.

What an “intelligent agent” usually requires

In philosophy and cognitive science, an intelligent agent typically has:
Persistent goals
Internal world models
The ability to act on the world to achieve goals
Learning driven by outcomes
Some degree of autonomy

LLMs:
Have no persistent goals
Do not act unless prompted
Do not update themselves during use
Do not evaluate success or failure
Do not choose actions

So calling an LLM an agent already stretches the term.

Why “intelligence” still gets used anyway

Because the word has drifted to mean:
“Produces outputs that look like the outputs of intelligent beings”
Which is descriptive, not explanatory.

That definition works for:
Chess engines
LLMs
Recommendation systems

…but it tells you nothing about how or why they work.

Etc

[BradZax]

Ekco im really struggling with AI corporate limits on what i can and cant interact with AI about.

I was just asking questions about the epstien files and about 90% of the answers were red text that said the answer was against usage policies.

Is there a free open source AI I can use that doesn't try to teach me a lesson about morality every time I ask it a question about everything? Or doesn't have any public information blacked out because of usage policies?

[Ekco]

try this one? think its running one of the jailbroken models
https://venice.ai/

i still use Deepseek/Gemini/Chatgpt but nothing i ask it is in the wrongthink camp to begin with so don't know how they handle it
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

i have that wizard one downloaded but haven't tested it, kaia been running Gemma3 12b for a couple weeks now
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[BradZax]

I literally asked CGPT what one of the Epstein victims accused him of and it redacted the answer with a big red usage policy violation.

Lol guess we know who pays their bills.

[Ekco]

well, it's certainly not the mennonites.