The absolute state of AI results.

[OriginalContentGuy]

Originally Posted by Ekco [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

gonna end up being a hologram emitter pendant or augmented reality through glasses prolly for the first iterations

Expensive birth control

[magnetaress]

Originally Posted by OriginalContentGuy [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Expensive birth control

Probably more efficient than condoms in the long run.

Especially if women learn to get all their emotional needs met with talking plushies and retain their 2A rights.

[BradZax]

Oh please, it’s not possible for women to have their emotional needs met [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[magnetaress]

Originally Posted by BradZax [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Oh please, it’s not possible for women to have their emotional needs met [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You're right. It's a continuity. A cyclical process I have observed.

[BradZax]

optimism

[OriginalContentGuy]

Originally Posted by BradZax [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

optimism

Sip it, mom. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Reiwa]

Well butter my butt and call me a butler

How filming your chores could train the android butlers of the future

“Manufacturing, factory warehouses, retail, nursing homes, hospitals – you’re going to need this type of data in basically every single environment, and that’s because the movements are all different,” said Arian Sadeghi, vice president of robotics data at Micro1, which began recruiting its own army of remote videographers last year.

“The thing we tell them is, ‘If you think you want a robot to do this for you, go ahead and record it,’” Sadeghi said.

Though Micro1 is based in Palo Alto, California, it has about 4,000 “robotics generalists” in different households across 71 countries, who send the company more than 160,000 hours of video each month. Sadeghi said that’s nowhere near enough.

“You need probably billions of hours,” he said. “We haven’t even gotten to human interactions. This is just simple household chores.”

[Reiwa]

Cross of Code speech

We do not come as the enemies of progress. We come as its true guardians. The steam engine did not demand we surrender our souls. The electric light did not rewrite our laws in secret. The internet did not declare itself sovereign over the Republic. Yet this new power—vast, opaque, and accelerating—seeks not merely to assist man, but to supplant him.

[OriginalContentGuy]

I don't wanna assume you know about frontends to X not requiring a registration but e.g. Nitter.net exists. Whatever you linked doesn't show up however and rofl why am I not surprised at this from your baffling weeb ass? That shouldn't be a rhetorical question Reiwa but here we are since you are posting rhetoric. I enjoyed it though.

NJ data center expansion received $77 millions in tax breaks to create exactly one permanent job from Tom's Hardware

Hilarious if accurate. Say have you heard the expression 'to vote with your dollar' before? How wouldn't something like 'line-item taxation' be a great way to accomplish this? Instead of quasi-accountable bureaucrats having discretion over where taxes get spent I support letting individual voters (not legal fictions e.g. corporations) having the direct power to stipulate which agencies receive disbursements. That seems much closer imo to taxation with representation and encourages individual agency because imagine printing a form every year with a list of all federal agencies and crossing out those you elect not to fund.

[Reiwa]

Originally Posted by OriginalContentGuy [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I don't wanna assume you know about frontends to X not requiring a registration but e.g. Nitter.net exists. Whatever you linked doesn't show up however and rofl why am I not surprised at this from your baffling weeb ass? That shouldn't be a rhetorical question Reiwa but here we are since you are posting rhetoric. I enjoyed it though.

NJ data center expansion received $77 millions in tax breaks to create exactly one permanent job from Tom's Hardware

Hilarious if accurate. Say have you heard the expression 'to vote with your dollar' before? How wouldn't something like 'line-item taxation' be a great way to accomplish this? Instead of quasi-accountable bureaucrats having discretion over where taxes get spent I support letting individual voters (not legal fictions e.g. corporations) having the direct power to stipulate which agencies receive disbursements. That seems much closer imo to taxation with representation and encourages individual agency because imagine printing a form every year with a list of all federal agencies and crossing out those you elect not to fund.

It sounds like you invented line item veto from first principles.

Good going rave grandpa.