NPC Spawn Issue: Cazic Thule and Innoruuk 2.0 are supposed to quad, but currently don't.

[CrazyPro]

https://dbsanfte.github.io/eq-archiv...-msg-15683.txt

On Mon, 18 Jun 2001 13:01:53 GMT, morpheus@cent.com (Dream King)
wrote:

>sang@choenet.com.remove.this.com (Sang K. Choe) wrote:
>
>>Which is why a 95% slow effect from rogue poison is absolutely
>>ridiculous (ok, so it's real hard to make, but once that poison
>>sticks, chain fear the mob--it'll run SO SLOWLY that it's the same as
>>if it was rooted...giving you total impunity to backstab like crazy).
>
> Rogue poison is also about the only way to slow the new cazic 3.0.
>Until that gets nerfed as well.

Slow what slow?
We weren't slowing CT v. 2.0.
Mainly because we never got a high level shaman to show up for the
damn muddite.

I didn't even realize they changed the resist table on CT v. 3.0 until
the necros started whining about their lifetaps being resisted.

We've always used the main tank + aggro control to beat him and when
folks listen (ie., don't push him up no stinking tree), we generally
drop the muddite with minimal of deaths (usually some numbnut caster
that got too close when CT rampaged and got bitchslapped for quad
600's).

-- Sang.

(CT and Inny 2.0 were slowable as the above newsgroup post mentions, but that was patched out. The current unslowable implementation of them is correct.)

https://everquest.allakhazam.com/db/...00189165679662

Tough Mofo
#Sep 30 2001 at 6:14 PMRating: Decent
__DEL__1591760017658
13 posts
Recently went in with about 70 peeps - 30 lev 60's and still couldn't kill him. First off pulling him is a little tricky because he'll just summon the puller and kill them in about 2 seconds. He has a knockback that will send you to the other side of the zone, an AE snare and fear spell and quads for 6-700. Have about 10 lev 60 tanks and rotate them because they will die. He is bad *** and if you think you're just gonna dance in and own him you're stupid. If you aggro him, you're dead. Simple as that. BTW he's not lev 65 anymore. At least 70 prolly closer to 75...about 300k hit points.

----------
Innoruuk

https://everquest.allakhazam.com/db/...00895425521716

Sindel Dourden
#Dec 21 2001 at 12:04 PMRating: Default
Anonymous
Anonymous
are you guys nuts saying a group...a group now went and killed Inny. Yeah right...that guy is a complete G-fluxing, Meeleeing, Rampaging, Quad hitting fool. He hits for 370-480 a hit and will summon you also if you gain aggro. Take it from a guild officer who knows instaed of hearing ungodly true unnecessary facts or tales. My guild had 53 peeps in hate and we took him down to about the R in his name before a wipe out. Thanks for reading this post. This may give you some insight on what to expect instaed of mere infomation.

Sindel Dourden
51st officer and Queen of Darkblood
Solusek Ro

Also, a dev will have to check this, but is Innoruuk 2.0 missing his "Cazic Shield" ability?
He should have a self-only buff with a 0 second recast timer (so it's essentially undispellable) which is a 3 hour 24 min duration 50pt damage shield and 50 hp per tick regen buff.
It's most definitely classic, it exists in a spell list from Dec 12, 2000. https://web.archive.org/web/20001209...pelllist2.php3

[CrazyPro]

Giga genius 255 INT Torven has spoken, it's not just that CT and Inny are missing dual wield on P99, it's that P99 is missing the mechanic that makes 66+ mobs innately dual wield. Also apparently 60+ warrior and monk mobs should innately triple attack? It seems like how this worked on EQMac is the closest thing we have to actual in-era proof, because I can't find anything else.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[CrazyPro]

Originally Posted by CrazyPro [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

(CT and Inny 2.0 were slowable as the above newsgroup post mentions, but that was patched out. The current unslowable implementation of them is correct.)

Correction: CT became unslowable after this patch, Inny stayed slowable.