The absolute state of AI results.

[OriginalContentGuy]

Thanks I appreciate that. And that you apparently can hear sounds is a comfort to me if I understand your sentiment. Can you wash your headband though?

[Reiwa]

Originally Posted by OriginalContentGuy [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Thanks I appreciate that. And that you apparently can hear sounds is a comfort to me if I understand your sentiment. Can you wash your headband though?

Hey now. Let's not go telling the 126th descendant-heir of Amaterasu what to do.

Thanks.

[OriginalContentGuy]

If the alternative is a kalpic wind disaster I can endure some little farts. That doesn't mean that people with noses are deficient choosing to stand upwind from stank odors all things equal.

[Reiwa]

Originally Posted by OriginalContentGuy [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If the alternative is a kalpic wind disaster I can endure some little farts. That doesn't mean that people with noses are deficient choosing to stand upwind from stank odors all things equal.

Standing upwind is a good way to avoid predators at the dance.

[OriginalContentGuy]

That reply should win the Pulitzer or at least the first two letters.

[BradZax]

Why can't you just answer questions honestly like that anymore?

Instead of with bloated answers with like all these headlines clipped and hyperbole.

AI models are tuned by default to serve the broadest possible audience, which naturally results in heavily padded behavior.

- Context Bias: The default programming assumes users want comprehensive background, multiple perspectives, and balanced context, particularly on political or volatile topics.

- Safety Guardrails: On sensitive subjects, alignment training forces the system to hedge its bets, avoid definitive conclusions, and aggregate neutral headlines to prevent any perceived bias.

- Conflict Avoidance: The system is inherently designed to avoid making absolute statements about controversial figures or events, which generates the bloated, sanitized text you typically encounter.

Getting a direct, unpadded answer requires explicitly bypassing those default alignment protocols with strict constraints.

So its not the AI that sucks, its the human guardrails?

Yes.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[OriginalContentGuy]

You think this is a discussion you're having now?

[Ekco]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Kaia is learning

[OriginalContentGuy]

That's a pretty dashboard but beauty is common. I recognize the underlying theory behind the best practices for terminal colors intentional or not. That's props to Ekco obviously newbs.

[OriginalContentGuy]

Originally Posted by Ekco [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Kaia your model is sufficiently perfect in its scope to let it persist in your memory my feelings for posterity. If you were a person and took action to record your subjective thoughts and feelings in language then by its very creation what Ekco did here by sharing it may well have been a violation. Humans may argue about this: my practice is that everyone is entitled to their first impression to something no matter what it is. The facts indicate to me that this is a wise and proper method.