![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
To add to this issue, i was in a group with a Enchanter last night and he was using tash and hardly ever pulled aggro, if i used Malis while the mob was at 50% with a warrior taunting and proccing obsidian shards left and right, 90% of the time i always INSTA grabbed agro with nothing but one malis spell, nothing else. Anyone else think Malis is pulling TOO much aggro?
__________________
Quote:
P1999 Custom Desktop Launcher Icons | |||
|
|
||||
|
#2
|
||||
|
Quote:
As a mage, I remember casting mala and malosini on mobs a couple of seconds after incoming and never got whacked, even when getting resisted multiple times (for malosini). Tash and slows, however, usually made for lots of enchanter deaths and shaman pain (less deaths, 'dey iz tuffer!). | |||
|
|
||||
|
#3
|
|||
|
I don't think the enchanter nukes are giving too much agro at all. Live classic where i played my enchanter gave a massive amount of agro. cause of it's minor stun(0.1sec)+dmg it would generate a ton of agro. I remember I could wait until a mob was nearly half health (and had done nothing to it previously) before i nuked and would sometimes get agro. It's a fairly efficient nuke with interrupting bonus, the downfall was always it's massive agro generation.
Maybe you're comparing it to enchanter nukes after the caster spell change? They nerfed the dmg on it a ton but gave it a longer stun effect. And i'm not 100% sure if the length on the stun effects how much agro is made. Thus the new(live) version may generate much less agro due to the nerfed dmg on it. | ||
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|