![]() |
#31
|
|||
|
![]() Good post man, you hit the nail on the head in regards to how classes stand pre-kunark and beyond.
| ||
|
#32
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
| |||
|
#33
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Project 1999 (PvE):
Giegue Nessithurtsithurts, 60 Bard <Divinity> Starman Deluxe, 24 Enchanter Lardna Minch, 18 Warrior Project 1999 (PvP): [50 (sometimes 49) Bard] Wolfram Alpha (Half Elf) ZONE: oasis | |||
|
#34
|
||||
|
![]() Original poster is indeed a fucking idiot - not classic.
Quote:
| |||
|
#35
|
|||
|
![]() A lot of that stuff comes from Kunark, which is relevant to people trying to make decisions since we should see Kunark within a year.
However, the subsequent flaming from the OP at anyone that differing opinions made it hard to take him seriously imo. These forums will primarily be flame fests, don't interact with the people that are trolling you, but flaming the people who try to have valid conversation with you is retarded. I actually appreciate seeing the differing opinions, it helps people that are new to EQ pvp make decisions and figure out how to play their class against others. | ||
|
#36
|
|||
|
![]() Why are you all trolling this guy trying to give something back to the community? It's not THAT Bad of advice. I mean some stuff I don't really agree with but you guys are raping his mouth.
| ||
|
#37
|
|||
|
![]() You guys blasting eachother on this is hilarious. Classic eq pvp was never black and white. Every class had an area where they shined shined pvp, whether it was solo/group or indoor/outdoor. The only excepion to this might be ranger's, they did not really shine in any situation during classic.
| ||
|
#38
|
|||
|
![]() Yo whermach-I mean tmoney did you even play EQ in 99? Everything you seem to post about as classic reflects kunark? Velious?
| ||
|
#40
|
|||
|
![]() Dumb, Dumber And Dumbest
| ||
|
![]() |
|
|