Egg-shaped pumice, chipped bone rod. - Page 15

Vohl · #**141** 10-14-2011, 09:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amuk [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The kid was comparing hybrid exp penalties to instant dispell pumices, pretty sure it wasn't a discussion just someone trolling the original timeline bullshit argument again, if you're that easily offended then GL pal btw.

I can weather name calling just fine. Keep your trashy hatred of jews and gays in RnF.

Juugox2 · #**142** 10-14-2011, 09:58 AM

lol i noticed 90% of the server crys alot

Palemoon · #**143** 10-14-2011, 10:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tmoneynegro [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I have to agree that since the server is in fact going to Velious, there is no conflict of interests by implementing PvP fixes up to that expansion.

I kinda agree. No need to start off with grossly broken pvp mechanics.

lindz · #**144** 10-14-2011, 01:18 PM

I dislike the picking and choosing of which mechanics are classic enough and what they decide to do away with. I understand getting rid of bugs (things that were never meant to be in the game and are harmful to the playerbase) but the server is supposed to be classic, not custom. Keep it that way. If the range they want to use is straight up classic through Velious, fine. If it is just classic and they nerf/change things when expansions are released, cool. Just stick with one method and don't make a custom server.

Sniperfire · #**145** 10-14-2011, 01:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Darksinga [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Who are you?

And I've been in the top guild on every pvp box that I've played. I was one of the guys who started Heresy on Daxum Box 1.0 and we destroyed every other guild.

Only other box I played on VZTZ was I think 2.0 and that was very briefly, had lambent gear when Kunark was out so that says a lot.

PS, didn't realize shit reputation meant being in the top 5 on pvp leaderboards as a bard. Hmm.

confirmed keyboard turner and alt tabber in pvp

fiegi · #**146** 10-14-2011, 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sniperfire [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

confirmed keyboard turner and alt tabber in pvp

lol

SoulLeech · #**147** 10-14-2011, 02:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lethdar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Pretty sure you're being hypocritical bro, I don't see you clamoring for rogues to pickpocket dragons clean, dragons to suicide when attacked, monks soloing planes with broken treant fists, and all of the classic dupes to be in game. All of that is 100% classic as well, which was fixed later. Should these game breaking things be in as well?

Continuum fallacy.

Sarkov · #**148** 10-14-2011, 02:51 PM

I can respect the pov of "server will go to velious, so net-positive feature changes up to that point can go in at launch". That same logic probably justifies things like temple of sol ro, removal of manastone/guise etc, but at least you leave yourself the out of qualifying things as a "net-positive." Unambiguously not a classic server at that point, but at least there is some defensible logic behind your proposed changes.

For my part, pvp in EQ is so grossly imbalanced that I don't really care whether we have pumice for a few months. The vast majority of pvp during classic is either going to be large-scale guild v guild "territory control", for which I hardly think pumice is game-breaking (since golem wands will be in, you arent exactly championing dispels as the purview of enchanters or anything like that), or gank-squads rolling around killing people 8 levels lower than them, again for which pumice makes effectively no difference.

Gnar · #**149** 10-14-2011, 03:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Darksinga [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Who are you?

And I've been in the top guild on every pvp box that I've played. I was one of the guys who started Heresy on Daxum Box 1.0 and we destroyed every other guild.

Only other box I played on VZTZ was I think 2.0 and that was very briefly, had lambent gear when Kunark was out so that says a lot.

PS, didn't realize shit reputation meant being in the top 5 on pvp leaderboards as a bard. Hmm.

Thanks sniperfire for reminding me about his awful videos. All you basically said here was that you played 2 boxes (there were only three) and only one of those you were in the top guild, Heresy 1.0. Guess who else was? Skunky and crew,lol. Heresy 1.0 was full of shit players and it means nothing. I was also in that guild and in Undisputed before we formed heresy. Everyone decent from heresy formed up with my guild No Homo, and we became the top guild on the server, and the best Emu PVP has ever seen / will see. We called ourselves the dream team for said reasons. The Dream Team members,whatever we end up calling ourselves will dominate red99. That is all. You are shit.

Sarkov · #**150** 10-14-2011, 03:04 PM

There are people who play pvp servers to roll hard and smoke bitches, and there are people who play pvp servers because they like disputes between raid guilds to be settled by large-scale pvp instead of crying to GMs.

I dont think these two sides understand each other very well [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]