Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Red Community > Red Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 10-18-2011, 12:05 AM
yaarii yaarii is offline
Large Bat


Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 12
Default

Oh and in my experience, team-based pvp tended to seem quite blue a lot of the time. On RZ, if you were trying to level, anyone who wanted that spot was almost certainly going to be in-range, and thus, a game-legal target. On SZ, I found that the hard-coded teams tended to divide up zones so you would find yourself only ever fighting IF an enemy team happened to come along. Which wasn't as often as I would like, because they were all bunched in their own zones most of the time to do their own levelling. I'm not saying there wasn't fun times to be had, but there were less genuine 'seat of the pants' moments.
  #42  
Old 10-18-2011, 12:18 AM
Softcore PK Softcore PK is offline
Planar Protector

Softcore PK's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Red99
Posts: 1,236
Default

I liked VZ ruleset, because it really brought about a lot of good roleplaying opportunities. And with the teams being soft-coded, players had a lot of freedom to do what they wanted.
__________________
“Smile, breathe, and go slowly.”
  #43  
Old 10-18-2011, 12:37 AM
MakeYouMad MakeYouMad is offline
Banned


Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 105
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nirgon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
RZ -> player decided "teams", that could ally with/against others or none at all. be broken up, reformed w/e.
SZ -> hard coded teams, f'ing ridiculous evil team advantage. iksars, ogres, best old world leveling spots.

I'd really be curious to see how the fighting on SZ stacked up against RZ at the end game in terms of meaningful PvP.
RZ was trash. EQ is a group based game for PvE. I don't like the idea of fighting some guy one day, grouping with him the next day, then fighting him again the day after. I'd rather have permanent enemies than weird shit like that.
  #44  
Old 10-18-2011, 12:43 AM
yaarii yaarii is offline
Large Bat


Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 12
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MakeYouMad [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
RZ was trash. EQ is a group based game for PvE. I don't like the idea of fighting some guy one day....
Stop right there. You seem to be on the wrong forum. You are looking for this forum.
  #45  
Old 10-18-2011, 12:53 AM
Durk Durk is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 65
Default

Good read. I enjoyed reading your experiences.
  #46  
Old 10-18-2011, 01:03 AM
MakeYouMad MakeYouMad is offline
Banned


Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 105
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by yaarii [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Stop right there. You seem to be on the wrong forum. You are looking for this forum.
Yea dude, what a real credible post you have. All those epics and no-drop raid gear on PvP servers just materialized out of thin air. Nobody PvE'd to get them.

RZ is trash because if you play the game like it's supposed to be played, random PK, kill everyone guy, then you will have nobody to group or raid with and get owned by people with raid gear/epics.

So the people actually winning on RZ, are the people avoiding PvP entirely, making as many alliances as they can, and doing PvE all the time for loot. Thus, the server and FFA ruleset in EQ is pointless.

SZ was much better since everyone on the server had a much easier ability to gear up. It wasn't based around who made the most alliances and being forced to join a guild or you're screwed.

I don't like games that basically revolve around kissing people's asses to try and get into a powerful guild for you to be able to do anything. A solo, un-guilded player on SZ could do well. A solo, un-guilded player on RZ will just get zerged to death by guilds of 12 year olds all day.
  #47  
Old 10-18-2011, 01:12 AM
SoulLeech SoulLeech is offline
Scrawny Gnoll


Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 27
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MakeYouMad [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
...trolling...
2/10

That shit about "if you play the game like it's supposed to be played" was the highlight.
  #48  
Old 10-18-2011, 01:12 AM
Nirgon Nirgon is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Ruins of Old Paineel
Posts: 14,480
Default

#trolling ^
  #49  
Old 10-18-2011, 02:49 AM
mourning mourning is offline
Sarnak

mourning's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 203
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Morninx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Just wanted to make sure you knew i did not waste my time reading your post. Get a real life.
I make 6 digits doin' nothin but gathering interest, I bang models and pop bottles all day.


You slave away at McDonalds to provide Big Macs for yourself. You are a virgin, and you Bang no models.

Good Day.
__________________
Mourning the Noble

So Immersed
  #50  
Old 10-18-2011, 03:55 AM
mourning mourning is offline
Sarnak

mourning's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 203
Default

7000 plat. fbss. lots of mithril armors. smr's. etc
actually ebayed alot of extra stuff. Sold mithril BP for about 100 dollars each on ebay.
__________________
Mourning the Noble

So Immersed
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:53 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.