Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Red Community > Red Server Chat

View Poll Results: If pvp exp was increased, by what %?
5 2 0.73%
10 1 0.37%
15 7 2.56%
20 36 13.19%
25 21 7.69%
30 8 2.93%
35 3 1.10%
40 5 1.83%
45 0 0%
50 38 13.92%
55 0 0%
60 0 0%
65 0 0%
70 0 0%
75 4 1.47%
80 0 0%
85 0 0%
90 0 0%
95 0 0%
100 77 28.21%
0. I am happy with the current experience rate. 71 26.01%
Voters: 273. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 02-12-2012, 06:48 PM
Bruuce Bruuce is offline
Sarnak

Bruuce's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 258
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lazortag [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Agreed, if there's any increase to the exp rate it should be no more than 20%. I'm okay with keeping exp as it is though.
i agree with this too
__________________
Kateausten
  #42  
Old 02-12-2012, 07:48 PM
Bkab Bkab is offline
Sarnak

Bkab's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Ohio
Posts: 307
Default

glad to see threads like this, regardless if it's a cock tease or not lol.

i remember when server first started we had an exp bonus from all the server lag/crashes. that exp modifier seemed perfect to me whatever it was, and I remember my whole group/guild in guk agreed. It wasn't so fast to the point you were cranking out a couple levels every hour or two, but it wasn't slow enough to the point where you wanted to gouge your fucking eyes out from watching your exp bar.

as long as we're on the topic, these stupid ass hybrid exp penalties should be removed asap. (even verant realized what a terrible idea/mistake this was).
__________________
  #43  
Old 02-13-2012, 01:06 AM
Rutaq Rutaq is offline
Orc

Rutaq's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 40
Default

I agree that leveling can be slow but rushing everyone along to 50 has it own set of problems, especially with the slow release of new content.

I think sliding the XP scale around so you can level 20-25% faster up to 20 and then weight things so you level slower from 45-50. That way we didn't speed things over all just displaced some of the xp grinding to levels that are better equipped.

Also I would be wary of messing with the XP penalties for the various races and hybrid classes. The XP penalty is there to offset the distinct advantages some races and classes have. By the time the penalties were removed back in the day the game had gone through a bunch of "balancing" and "itemization" that the Classic servers don't have.
  #44  
Old 02-13-2012, 01:11 AM
Hughman Hughman is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 123
Default

Voted 20% overall, what probably would work better is a 50% increase for 1-30.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bkab [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
as long as we're on the topic, these stupid ass hybrid exp penalties should be removed asap. (even verant realized what a terrible idea/mistake this was).
  #45  
Old 02-13-2012, 01:57 AM
Lazortag Lazortag is offline
Planar Protector

Lazortag's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,635
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bkab [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

as long as we're on the topic, these stupid ass hybrid exp penalties should be removed asap. (even verant realized what a terrible idea/mistake this was).
Do you really think Bards shouldn't have an exp penalty?
__________________
Project 1999 (PvE):
Giegue Nessithurtsithurts, 60 Bard <Divinity>
Starman Deluxe, 24 Enchanter
Lardna Minch, 18 Warrior

Project 1999 (PvP):
[50 (sometimes 49) Bard] Wolfram Alpha (Half Elf) ZONE: oasis
  #46  
Old 02-13-2012, 02:11 AM
Morninx Morninx is offline
Banned


Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 179
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amelinda [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
i think searyx had a really good idea as far as increasing xp for players level 25 and below then spreading that xp required among the higher levels. so you could get to level 25 faster and retain players better. i think a slight xp bump would help also.
As a former VZTZ player. I wish exp rates were very high from the beginning to emphasize PvP on the server and not grinding. In hindsight I was half wrong. I am currently enjoying the slower grind, even though i wish it was ez mode to level up an alt since I wont enjoy it twice. But the classic experience is not for everyone and not for a PvP community and has been the #1 reason for the servers struggles.

Searyx has provided the best option as Amelinda has agreed to above. To save the server, something drastic needs to happen. Maybe a 20% exp bonus would have helped from the beginning, but it wont do the trick now. I believe making it easy for new players to level from 1-25 would be an excellent idea and wouldn't hurt the classic feel of the server (It is a necessary evil for survival). Saying that, I do not believe that completely slowing down levels 25-50 is necessary. For a PvP server, they are difficult enough(maybe a little slower) and if poopsockers want to rush to 50, good for them. The simple fact is, this is a 13 year old game that is very enjoyable for the hardcore players and the casual players and imo tweaks to the server to help casual players will only help the overall server. What ever the decision is, even if this poll was just to shut us up, Thank You for your time and efforts.
  #47  
Old 02-13-2012, 02:13 AM
Morninx Morninx is offline
Banned


Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 179
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lazortag [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Do you really think Bards shouldn't have an exp penalty?
Bards/Rogues/Warrs/Rangers all need exp bonus.. Theres like 8 on the server.. Total.
  #48  
Old 02-13-2012, 02:14 AM
Lazortag Lazortag is offline
Planar Protector

Lazortag's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,635
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Morninx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Bards/Rogues/Warrs/Rangers all need exp bonus.. Theres like 8 on the server.. Total.
That's irrelevant, Bards exp at an absurdly fast rate.
__________________
Project 1999 (PvE):
Giegue Nessithurtsithurts, 60 Bard <Divinity>
Starman Deluxe, 24 Enchanter
Lardna Minch, 18 Warrior

Project 1999 (PvP):
[50 (sometimes 49) Bard] Wolfram Alpha (Half Elf) ZONE: oasis
  #49  
Old 02-13-2012, 02:15 AM
Supreme Supreme is offline
Planar Protector

Supreme's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Rivervale,Texas
Posts: 1,077
Default

Honest there is nothing wrong with the server.

Blue released epics right after Red99 went live. It hurt but having 170 players online each night pre-kunark is pretty good.

XP bonus will NOT increase the amount of players playing here.
  #50  
Old 02-13-2012, 02:24 AM
fiegi fiegi is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,209
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Supreme [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Honest there is nothing wrong with the server.

Blue released epics right after Red99 went live. It hurt but having 170 players online each night pre-kunark is pretty good.

XP bonus will NOT increase the amount of players playing here.
Trolling?
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:53 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.