Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #241  
Old 03-01-2012, 10:34 PM
Teddie1056 Teddie1056 is offline
Kobold

Teddie1056's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Rivervale
Posts: 189
Default

What I see here is a double standard for VD. We are not powerful enough to get an exclusive rotation spot, but we are too powerful to be given a spot away from TMO to compete with the rest of the server.

Honestly, it should either be

1. TMO
2. VD
3. Everyone Else

or

1. TMO
2. Everyone else

or even

1. TMO
2. Everyone else
3. Everyone but TMO or VD

If you really consider us the family guild you say we are, then we deserve a chance to duke it out with the rest of the server unhindered. If we are too strong for that, give us a fair rotation.
  #242  
Old 03-01-2012, 10:44 PM
quido quido is offline
Planar Protector

quido's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,501
Default

Teddie you don't make much sense to me.
__________________
Bush <Toxic>
Jeremy <TMO> - Patron Saint of Blue
  #243  
Old 03-01-2012, 10:49 PM
ibso ibso is offline
Large Bat


Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 13
Default

How about the cool people from TMO and VD (I'm sure there are many in each) unite & form one guild... call it TMD or VDO. They can kill dragons and be happy. Then, all the pissy RnF morons left over can form their own guild/guilds (doesn't matter) and continue to complain about each other and everything.
  #244  
Old 03-01-2012, 10:53 PM
ibso ibso is offline
Large Bat


Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 13
Default

Also, I've been wondering: Why do you people keep playing the '12 year old' card against each other. As if the age of the game has anything to do with anything. The game is fun and that's why you play it. If it's twelve years old and fun, it's the same as if its six months old and fun. It seems like a cheap & easy way for people to demean others without addressing any real argument. 'Haha umad over 12 y.o. game lawlz!1'.

Oh wait, this is RnF.
  #245  
Old 03-01-2012, 10:54 PM
Teddie1056 Teddie1056 is offline
Kobold

Teddie1056's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Rivervale
Posts: 189
Default

Agree to disagree Jeremy.

And problem is Ibso, there are cool people in both guilds who don't like each other just due to tag. Most of us assume that the other guild is full of mass murderers who cheat and steal. CAN'T WE ALL GET ALONG! Kumbaya
  #246  
Old 03-01-2012, 11:04 PM
Abacab PvP Prophet Abacab PvP Prophet is offline
Banned


Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 20
Default

The server took the wrong action by banning Abacab; at least I kept guilds in check! Now that I've lost my ability to regulate the raid situation these guilds have grown too large and now threaten the stability of the server with all of their partisan infighting.

VOTE YES on unbanning Abacab to fix this inflation of egos
  #247  
Old 03-01-2012, 11:05 PM
Teddie1056 Teddie1056 is offline
Kobold

Teddie1056's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Rivervale
Posts: 189
Default

Pfff. Abacab...

Bring back Fourthmeal
  #248  
Old 03-01-2012, 11:07 PM
quido quido is offline
Planar Protector

quido's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,501
Default

How about Zeelot plays Coldblooded in beer pong and the winner gets to dictate the terms?
__________________
Bush <Toxic>
Jeremy <TMO> - Patron Saint of Blue
  #249  
Old 03-01-2012, 11:14 PM
deneauth deneauth is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Southwestern Michigan
Posts: 267
Default

Haha omg jeremy you gave me a lol fit at work with that one
  #250  
Old 03-01-2012, 11:15 PM
Visual Visual is offline
Fire Giant

Visual's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 751
Default

Unlike my brother, I have had a pleasant experience with VD for the most part. With that being said, this just seems like a pathetic plea at getting a piece of the pie.

You disguise this as a motion to share, but in reality you got the prior two traks out of our temporary complacency and seemed to be content but once you realized that we are indeed faster and generally more skilled players (which can admittingly change over time) who can outmobilize you at the drop of a hat, you changed your tune.

While you say this is an attempt at distributing the wealth, in actuality it's just a well formulated ploy to get a share of the traks since you know in reality you will get none (1/3 is better than 0 amirite) if our guild so chooses.

disclaimer: this is just my opinion and I am in no way claiming this represents the consensus nor opinions of officers in my guild)

Thank you
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:33 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.