Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old 11-12-2012, 02:54 PM
doraf doraf is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Santa Barbara, CA.
Posts: 191
Default

You guys should never let Altari and I post in the same threads. We are the masters of derail.

What if we did some type of random roll between the guilds. The winning guild stays and fights the mob w/o interruption assuming they can kill within a reasonable time. The other guild looks for something else. There is no more summoning a GM into every single raid encounter and loot stays on the guild that killed it.
  #52  
Old 11-12-2012, 02:55 PM
Harazzer Harazzer is offline
Aviak

Harazzer's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 83
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ephi [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Not at all what I'm saying.

Every situation is judged by its unique circumstances. Hence the reason FE was awarded a VS kill even though they did not technically get FTE in the encounter log.

We do what we can to eliminate all the different variables that could merit a kill to someone who perhaps does not deserve it. But we also make mistakes from time to time. I saw no attempt by FE to actually kill CT. In a 34 second fight, not one other person outside of Scorchin got onto the aggro list.

I made the best call I could, but like I said in fear, if anyone has evidence that speaks against my ruling, Sirken and I would both be happy to review it. You know where to find us.

And if some think I favor one guild or another, you are sorely mistaken. I really have no dog in this fight. Just a volunteer trying to keep the playing grounds as fair as possible. Put another way: I could give a shit about guild XYZ over guild ABC.
VS was an entirely different situation. Nothing about that applies here.

In this situation we had a raid force, I got FTE, then TMO Jumped on the mob and killed it. When can you say FTE snipe is any different than initiating a pull and what they did is any different from them KSing it? FTE is supposed to take all of the GM discretion out of a given situation, make it so it is not a call based on favoritism but one of hard evidence. Every other time the FTE situation has come up its "soandso got fte, congrats guild of soandso!" but this time we are all about "the Spirit of FTE" whatever the fuck that is.

And yea, you and every GM in history is an unbiased bastion of blind justice. Never heard that before either.

I don't care about the mob, or the loot which was shitty as i understand it... What i care about is the idea that the precedents and rules of the server can be whimsically overturned by a new GM that can clearly be influenced by cryspam of TMO.
__________________
Sominus - 60 Enchanter
Scorchin - 60 Wizard
Vhing - 57 Shadowknight
  #53  
Old 11-12-2012, 02:56 PM
hatelore hatelore is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Texico
Posts: 631
Default

That sounds great, until you realize your raid force was in the zone first, and then the slackers who got there after you win the roll.
  #54  
Old 11-12-2012, 02:56 PM
HeallunRumblebelly HeallunRumblebelly is offline
Planar Protector

HeallunRumblebelly's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Roanoke, Indiana
Posts: 1,353
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Dude 0 damage from an FE member on the mob? Are you trying to convince us you planned to engage CT?
right, but if you are unsure of FTE you are not supposed to engage the mob. this will be fixed when fte shout comes in, just a poor call against precedent for now, though each GM has interpreted the raid rules at their own discretion so far.
  #55  
Old 11-12-2012, 02:57 PM
Alarti0001 Alarti0001 is offline
Planar Protector

Alarti0001's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,500
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Harazzer [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
VS was an entirely different situation. Nothing about that applies here.

In this situation we had a raid force, I got FTE, then TMO Jumped on the mob and killed it. When can you say FTE snipe is any different than initiating a pull and what they did is any different from them KSing it? FTE is supposed to take all of the GM discretion out of a given situation, make it so it is not a call based on favoritism but one of hard evidence. Every other time the FTE situation has come up its "soandso got fte, congrats guild of soandso!" but this time we are all about "the Spirit of FTE" whatever the fuck that is.

And yea, you and every GM in history is an unbiased bastion of blind justice. Never heard that before either.

I don't care about the mob, or the loot which was shitty as i understand it... What i care about is the idea that the precedents and rules of the server can be whimsically overturned by a new GM that can clearly be influenced by cryspam of TMO.
Reread his last post. Drui got FTE =)
__________________
Irony
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samoht View Post
It's pretty clear he's become one of the people he described as No-life Nerds and Server Bullies.
  #56  
Old 11-12-2012, 02:58 PM
Tasslehofp99 Tasslehofp99 is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,314
Default

Damn I had high hopes for this thread.
  #57  
Old 11-12-2012, 02:59 PM
Harazzer Harazzer is offline
Aviak

Harazzer's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 83
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Reread his last post. Drui got FTE =)
Yea you said that before, and in classic alarti fashion I couldn't tell if you were trolling or just that fucking retarded. Apparently its the latter. Clearly he was hit by the zonewide random dt since my name was first on the encounter log. Otherwise it he would have been on the aggro list.
__________________
Sominus - 60 Enchanter
Scorchin - 60 Wizard
Vhing - 57 Shadowknight
  #58  
Old 11-12-2012, 02:59 PM
Tasslehofp99 Tasslehofp99 is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,314
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Reread his last post. Drui got FTE =)
Then that directly contradicts what was originally stated, as shown in the screenshot posted in the original post of this thread.
  #59  
Old 11-12-2012, 03:00 PM
Rovas Rovas is offline
Orc


Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 30
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tasslehofp99 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Damn I had high hopes for this thread.
Never have hopes or feelings in RnF, you will only end up hurting yourself.
  #60  
Old 11-12-2012, 03:00 PM
Alarti0001 Alarti0001 is offline
Planar Protector

Alarti0001's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,500
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tasslehofp99 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Then that directly contradicts what was originally stated, as shown in the screenshot posted in the original post of this thread.
Just like sending one man in to FTE while your guild does nothing contradicts a kill attempt.
__________________
Irony
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samoht View Post
It's pretty clear he's become one of the people he described as No-life Nerds and Server Bullies.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:36 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.