Quote:
Originally Posted by Lazortag
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I think the problem here is that, from an outsider's perspective, it looks as if the hardcore guilds are trying to trivialize trak or conceal the fact that he's too easy, since it's mostly hardcore raiders who've responded (with the exception of Loraen I guess). I think this is the narrative Nirgon is trying to promote, because there is absolutely no basis to his claim that level 55's can resist trak's ae with ease. From the few times I've been on Trak raids on this server, I have trouble resisting the ae even at level 60 with insane bard resists. When I was in my low-mid 50's I literally never resisted it. This isn't a case of big guilds trying to cover up an exploit, this is just Nirgon trying to stroke his own ego and act as if he's a guru on classic eq by saying things we already know (like that the ae does 1200 damage. Really we needed you to tell us that, thanks Nirgon).
|
Nailed it.
Non factors gonna not factor.
The whole pretense of being experienced in this era as an RZ vet is laughable too. Anyone who played end game kunark-velious knows dragons stayed up for weeks at a time due to lower pop and much higher competition. The opportunity to truly test pve was therefore nonexistent. Better off lying saying you played a blue server. It would carry more weight.
On dragon roar, go ahead and try to resist 60+ dragon roar every time without base 160mr + pot + gmr + bard songs. You gettin' feared.
02-22-2013, 07:15 AM
Threaded Mode