Progression? lol - Page 10

Massive Marc · #91 10-21-2011, 07:16 PM

Funny, how when someone brings up the argument about 300 people not being banned, rogs and nilbog change the topic.

simple question, why complain about the player base being ignorant , ungrateful fucks and not ban the same people when they blatantly cheated and went against your rules.

mitic · #92 10-21-2011, 07:19 PM

you blue raiders are such a bunch of emos....this is hillarious

**Rogean** · #93 10-21-2011, 07:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eccezan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Which part of my argument has been shit upon that says that about 17 members of TR INLCUDING OFFICERS were openly and self admittedly caught cheating. Yet there was no raid suspension. And hate to beat a broken horse, but I think DA got raid suspended for having a random player use MQ in a non-raid zone, right? I was never in DA. But I think that this point was never asnwered clearly....but we all know that GM's and server staff don't need to answer questions. So don't, we already know why they werent raid suspended.

You know I'm getting tired of seeing the whole "TMO are angels because TR had one officer banned and we didn't" argument. I've been meaning to say this for a while:

It's pretty common knowledge that the leader of TMO posted a warning to the guild on their forums about the DLL and it's capabilities, minutes after the patch that introduced it.

Whether this information was leaked from our staff, or reverse engineered, or simply he knew enough to be cautious about it, is irrelevant... why would he have to make that announcement/warning if TMO had nothing to hide from it? And also import is knowing that, tmo still had the same number of guild members caught as tr did.

Massive Marc · #94 10-21-2011, 07:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rogean [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You know I'm getting tired of seeing the whole "TMO are angels because TR had one officer banned and we didn't" argument. I've been meaning to say this for a while:

It's pretty common knowledge that the leader of TMO posted a warning to the guild on their forums about the DLL and it's capabilities, minutes after the patch that introduced it.

Whether this information was leaked from our staff, or reverse engineered, or simply he knew enough to be cautious about it, is irrelevant... why would he have to make that announcement/warning if TMO had nothing to hide from it? And also import is knowing that, tmo still had the same number of guild members caught as tr did.

SO WHY ARE YOU NOT DOING ANYTHING ABOUT IT ?????

Sold · #95 10-21-2011, 07:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rogean [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You know I'm getting tired of seeing the whole "TMO are angels because TR had one officer banned and we didn't" argument. I've been meaning to say this for a while:

It's pretty common knowledge that the leader of TMO posted a warning to the guild on their forums about the DLL and it's capabilities, minutes after the patch that introduced it.

Whether this information was leaked from our staff, or reverse engineered, or simply he knew enough to be cautious about it, is irrelevant... why would he have to make that announcement/warning if TMO had nothing to hide from it? And also import is knowing that, tmo still had the same number of guild members caught as tr did.

Loly is the man who saw the DLL file and posted it FYI, can we also get back to quickfingers getting his epic peices from uthgaard 8)?

Eccezan · #96 10-21-2011, 07:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rogean [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You know I'm getting tired of seeing the whole "TMO are angels because TR had one officer banned and we didn't" argument. I've been meaning to say this for a while:

It's pretty common knowledge that the leader of TMO posted a warning to the guild on their forums about the DLL and it's capabilities, minutes after the patch that introduced it.

Whether this information was leaked from our staff, or reverse engineered, or simply he knew enough to be cautious about it, is irrelevant... why would he have to make that announcement/warning if TMO had nothing to hide from it? And also import is knowing that, tmo still had the same number of guild members caught as tr did.

Are you serious? You actually bought that? You think there was a warning in the super secret TMO forums (that were hacked btw) about your fucking DLL file? In actuality Loly did see something suspicious and it was posted in officer chat and pretty much completely disregarded as fucking programmer jargon. There was no such warning. For you to be bringing up and backing up known cheaters with your first phrase is 100% attempt at distraction.

Anger · #97 10-21-2011, 07:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Harrison [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Anger? Anon trolls lol

I fail to see how this thread is a troll. I was ranting about VP/epics.

That is what we do here, right? Rant, and flame?

**Rogean** · #98 10-21-2011, 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eccezan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You even had your hardest working member of your CSR community quit over obvious cheating by a developer that "FORMERLY" (or might still behind the scenes) played the game? Where is my argument shit on? I had my runin's with Uthgaard, but he really tried his best to give some legitimancy to this server. Many others agree with me here. The way you the rest of the staff treated him before he was exasperated enough to leave just goes to show how people's hard work is appreciated.

As I've said in another thread somewhere, don't pretend you know the full story about why Uthgaard quit.. because frankly, you don't. I have a lot of respect for everything Uthgaard did, but there comes a time just like in any work environment, and especially a volunteer one, where it's time for co-workers to part ways.

Massive Marc · #99 10-21-2011, 07:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Massive Marc [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Funny, how when someone brings up the argument about 300 people not being banned, rogs and nilbog change the topic.

simple question, why complain about the player base being ignorant , ungrateful fucks and not ban the same people when they blatantly cheated and went against your rules.

Estu · #**100** 10-21-2011, 07:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ames [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Not that i give a fuck about guild drama - BUT, If all of TMO's members left the server that is at least 100-150 gone from a server that is only hitting 400ish max players as of late. 1/4th of your player base leaving is a pretty big thing.

This is a terrible post. First, the max server pop is still 500-600; as I write this, there are over 500 online. Second, and I don't know why people keep thinking otherwise, those 500 people are NOT THE SAME PEOPLE EVERY TIME. There is a ton of variation in who is online at any given moment; the actual number of people playing actively (say, logging in at least once a week for at least an hour) is way more than the max population at any given moment. As in, several times that amount. Did you notice how there was no noticeable decrease in server population when there were ~350 people suspended? According to your math, 7/8 of the server population should have been absent. DURR