Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #111  
Old 12-23-2013, 04:35 PM
Nirgon Nirgon is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Ruins of Old Paineel
Posts: 14,480
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hatelore [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Really? You are sure they put in 30x more then me, or peeps in my guild or other guilds? You are also sure rogean just swung a big ol ban hammer blindly too right? I am pretty sure, you know, since we are all so sure and all... That you are talking out of your ass.
If you think 106 people were independently using this bug and it didn't leak outside of the guild...

I don't even know what to tell you.

Consider also how many non-TMO accounts were banned (20ish?) and it didn't leak to the general masses either.

Since Liia was banned, was everyone in the A-Team doing it too? I suspect Liia, nor any other A-Team members were doing it either.

So sorry that objective reasoning has made you an enemy of me.

The fact you would want other players banned because of a guild tag, whether they did anything or not, does not speak well of you.
  #112  
Old 12-23-2013, 04:36 PM
Alarti0001 Alarti0001 is offline
Planar Protector

Alarti0001's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,500
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nirgon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
If you think 106 people were independently using this bug and it didn't leak outside of the guild...

I don't even know what to tell you.

Consider also how many non-TMO accounts were banned (20ish?) and it didn't leak to the general masses either.

Since Liia was banned, was everyone in the A-Team doing it too? I suspect Liia, nor any other A-Team members were doing it either.

So sorry that objective reasoning has made you an enemy of me.

The fact you would want other players banned because of a guild tag, whether they did anything or not, does not speak well of you.
Nirgon forum hero.
__________________
Irony
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samoht View Post
It's pretty clear he's become one of the people he described as No-life Nerds and Server Bullies.
  #113  
Old 12-23-2013, 04:37 PM
Raavak Raavak is offline
Planar Protector

Raavak's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Creepin' inta your back door.
Posts: 2,038
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by talian21 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Many of your recruits simply join you to get their epics, b/c you've cockblocked them to the point of either coming up with a retarded amount of plat, or join the assholes, even though they cannot stand you.
Isn't this why people joined endgame guilds since they came into existence? Then they find out how fun it is to kill dragons, and that there are some really cool people who are members, they make friends. Next thing they know they are part of a family. The story has been told thousands of times.
__________________
[60 Sorcerer] Rakpartha (Erudite)
[60 High Priest] Doktyr (Dwarf)
[45 Shadow Knight] Elandrea (Dark Elf)
  #114  
Old 12-23-2013, 04:37 PM
hatelore hatelore is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Texico
Posts: 631
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nirgon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
If you think 106 people were independently using this bug and it didn't leak outside of the guild...

I don't even know what to tell you.

Consider also how many non-TMO accounts were banned (20ish?) and it didn't leak to the general masses either.

Since Liia was banned, was everyone in the A-Team doing it too? I suspect Liia, nor any other A-Team members were doing it either.

So sorry that objective reasoning has made you an enemy of me.

The fact you would want other players banned because of a guild tag, whether they did anything or not, does not speak well of you.

For one, I don't consider you an enemy. For two, you probably shouldn't attempt to input words into my mouth. I trust that if Rogean swung that ban hammer, there was a definite purpose for it.
  #115  
Old 12-23-2013, 04:38 PM
Lammy Lammy is offline
Fire Giant

Lammy's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 548
Default

This server must be littered with Obama supporters. No one ever wants to address a question asked or provide any type of factual evidence supporting their claims to the "TMO is Scum."

Yes, some people cheated. No, the guild didn't know about it as a whole. The cheaters were punished, as if they would have been had they been in any other guild, and the game goes on.

Now, TMO still exists and will continue to raid with the blessing of the CSR staff. Should we be more consciences of others? probably so, and I'm still a firm believer that even before this announcement, TMO was taking small steps to allowing others to raid with us, and even win loots.

However, we put a lot of time and effort into catching these mobs. But ya know what? when other guilds put in time and effort, they take targets from us, as simple as that.

BDA - grats 6+ Vox kills in a row recently even when TMO tracked and contested you. Why? You gave it a dedicated effort.

Taken - Grats 5+ Inny kills in a row recently even when TMO tracked and contested you. Why? You gave it a dedicated effort.

No one from TMO is starting rants that we lost two targets so often that we care about (and yes, we still have members who need these targets.) The 4th/5th alt is just ignorant speak. Again, yes I acknowledge that often times loot goes to alts, but it's only when the items we need for mains don't drop. Until you people know what you're talking about, and present facts, it's all a ridiculous to discuss. I'm in favor of some reform, but not hand outs. This is a game, and we play it a lot and we play it well, it's as simple as that. It's not personal.
__________________
  #116  
Old 12-23-2013, 04:40 PM
talian21 talian21 is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 141
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Maybe, they do join us to get epics... but I can say most people who do join us, stay. (
This, of course, is in direct contradiction with your "high turnover" comment, of course. Spin on, dipshit.





-Silisk, ikky necro
  #117  
Old 12-23-2013, 04:43 PM
YendorLootmonkey YendorLootmonkey is offline
Planar Protector

YendorLootmonkey's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Surefall Glade
Posts: 2,203
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Autotune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
It's not the first time they've done this either. The interesting time I like to recall is the time when IB and TMO were the top guilds and both got suspended. The guilds all came together and VD was like, yea we are the nice guys... and then shit all over every other guild for pixels.
If you're talking about the time TR & TMO couldn't raid outside of VP when it opened... no one seemed to have an issue with the way VD took targets. We went one at a time... nothing died within 5 mins of spawn. There was lag and the repop happened at 3am... we left Trak up for hours and Div/Taken/BDA could have attempted... they went for other targets.

http://www.project1999.com/forums/sh...&postcount=240
__________________
Another witty, informative, and/or retarded post by:

"You know you done fucked up when Yendor gives you raid commentary." - Tiggles
  #118  
Old 12-23-2013, 04:45 PM
Raavak Raavak is offline
Planar Protector

Raavak's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Creepin' inta your back door.
Posts: 2,038
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lammy [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
BDA - grats 6+ Vox kills in a row recently even when TMO tracked and contested you. Why? You gave it a dedicated effort.

Taken - Grats 5+ Inny kills in a row recently even when TMO tracked and contested you. Why? You gave it a dedicated effort.
TMO was co-raiding with some up-and-coming guilds as well. And no, we didn't take loot. I see more of this happening after the suspension runs its course.
__________________
[60 Sorcerer] Rakpartha (Erudite)
[60 High Priest] Doktyr (Dwarf)
[45 Shadow Knight] Elandrea (Dark Elf)
  #119  
Old 12-23-2013, 04:46 PM
Alarti0001 Alarti0001 is offline
Planar Protector

Alarti0001's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,500
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by talian21 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
This, of course, is in direct contradiction with your "high turnover" comment, of course. Spin on, dipshit.





-Silisk, ikky necro
Where is my high turnover comment. It was someone else's comment. Turnover in that person is more related to people taking a break from the game due to no new content, not from people leaving the guild. We have a very very high retention rate.

Thanks again from proving your bias and inability to think objectively (or at all).
__________________
Irony
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samoht View Post
It's pretty clear he's become one of the people he described as No-life Nerds and Server Bullies.
  #120  
Old 12-23-2013, 04:47 PM
Raavak Raavak is offline
Planar Protector

Raavak's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Creepin' inta your back door.
Posts: 2,038
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by talian21 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
This, of course, is in direct contradiction with your "high turnover" comment, of course. Spin on, dipshit.
They don't leave TMO. They stop playing and post a "see ya in Velious".

Spin on, dipshit.
__________________
[60 Sorcerer] Rakpartha (Erudite)
[60 High Priest] Doktyr (Dwarf)
[45 Shadow Knight] Elandrea (Dark Elf)
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:24 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.