DPS: Monk vs. Warrior vs. Rogue vs. Ranger

[Toxigen]

sips coffee and smiles

[Troxx]

#popcorn

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Croco [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

How about you just stop posting in this thread completely. You've already made all the correct posts and arguments right? Surely anyone will be able to come along and see the merits of everything you've said and be able to sus out that everyone else is just a troll right? So there's no need for you to keep going, right?

Bet you will though.

It looks like you want to stop posting, as you didn't attack anyone this time.

You shouldn't have posted here at all, since your intent was simply to troll and bloat the thread. You have zero on-topic posts. Next time learn some self control. Remember that you have been banned before due to your behavior.

You can have the last post if you wish. If it doesn't attack anyone, I won't respond to you further in this thread.

Thank you for taking responsibility for the thread bloat, and seeking to stop it. That is some progress towards your rehabilitation I hope.

[Snaggles]

I actually think DSM did a great job on the 2nd post of the thread. Granted, these are certainly best case scenarios (warrior zerking and not dying, avatar ranger BFG, etc) but shows a similar level of geared toons.

About a page later people clarified that generally it’s rogue > monk > warrior/ranger which more or less is accurate. As warriors need to be using non-tank weapons and forfeiting a defensive disc timer it is rare they pop into the lead on a parse outside damage shield dps. It’s even more rare to be zerking. 120+ dps, on the edge of blood aggro, no way to dump thread…roll the dice.

While there are a lot of BFG’s still in use it’s another edge-case. Legacy weapon, needing 8dmg arrows to shine, suffer a 72 min CD which is generally saved to bump. A lot can happen in 72 mins on a quake so while I’ve burned mine gleefully on Vindi those 72 minutes after aren’t exactly comforting as you wait to reset it.

The monk vs rogue game is odd. Clearly a rogue has a leg-up in terms of ease to get to a solid level, 30k Epic MQ and you are a beast. Monks need a lot of help to close that gap. Usually there is peppered “but they can tank/solo/pull” added to disclaim the difference. Mend is nice for AoE fights and all that. In the end though one class is more purpose built than the rest because outside picking locks and a slick invis mechanic they are a single purpose tool and very efficient. If you are talking ONLY DPS the rest of the stuff while helping justify your choice is just a red herring.

The rest of this thread doesn’t need to keep going. The AoW thing could have been a quick retraction. This isn’t court, admitting you might be (or are) wrong is a quick solution to a problem. The rest of the pages are just a train wreck, nobody needs to keep this going and while some may be more or less to blame it’s a shared experience.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Snaggles [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I actually think DSM did a great job on the 2nd post of the thread. Granted, these are certainly best case scenarios (warrior zerking and not dying, avatar ranger BFG, etc) but shows a similar level of geared toons.

About a page later people clarified that generally it’s rogue > monk > warrior/ranger which more or less is accurate. As warriors need to be using non-tank weapons and forfeiting a defensive disc timer it is rare they pop into the lead on a parse outside damage shield dps. It’s even more rare to be zerking. 120+ dps, on the edge of blood aggro, no way to dump thread…roll the dice.

While there are a lot of BFG’s still in use it’s another edge-case. Legacy weapon, needing 8dmg arrows to shine, suffer a 72 min CD which is generally saved to bump. A lot can happen in 72 mins on a quake so while I’ve burned mine gleefully on Vindi those 72 minutes after aren’t exactly comforting as you wait to reset it.

The monk vs rogue game is odd. Clearly a rogue has a leg-up in terms of ease to get to a solid level, 30k Epic MQ and you are a beast. Monks need a lot of help to close that gap. Usually there is peppered “but they can tank/solo/pull” added to disclaim the difference. Mend is nice for AoE fights and all that. In the end though one class is more purpose built than the rest because outside picking locks and a slick invis mechanic they are a single purpose tool and very efficient. If you are talking ONLY DPS the rest of the stuff while helping justify your choice is just a red herring.

The rest of this thread doesn’t need to keep going. The AoW thing could have been a quick retraction. This isn’t court, admitting you might be (or are) wrong is a quick solution to a problem. The rest of the pages are just a train wreck, nobody needs to keep this going and while some may be more or less to blame it’s a shared experience.

Agreed!

[Troxx]

Originally Posted by Snaggles [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I actually think DSM did a great job on the 2nd post of the thread.

Yes he did. Unfortunately, he didn’t stop there.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yes he did. Unfortunately, he didn’t stop there.

You and the trolls didn't stop there. Having a discussion about game mechanics is normal, regardless of who is right or wrong. Attacking other posters is not, and is against the forum rules. Do you want to continue bloating the thread via more attacks?

[Troxx]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yes, any class can survive AoW with enough Clerics. If you don't understand the basic math there, that's on you.

You weren’t just 100% wrong you also insinuated you understood some imaginary math that doesn’t exist.

Can we get back on topic and stay there?

Jesus.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You weren’t just 100% wrong you also insinuated you understood some imaginary math that doesn’t exist.

Can we get back on topic and stay there?

Jesus.

We can get back on topic when you stop trolling and acting like a child. You keep forgetting that yourself and your fellow trolls derailed the thread to begin with by attacking people.

You have also been 100% wrong while insinuating your experience matters more than math. This was with the JBB argument. I proved that you were wrong about leveling with JBB, yet you continue to post things that aren't true about JBB. The difference between us is I admit when I am wrong.

[Troxx]

You attacked another poster (Toxigen) who was correct citing your understanding of “math” that he didn’t comprehend. It was a childish attack … and extraordinarily idiotic given that you were wrong.

YOU derailed this thread like you always do. Please for the love of god just tuck your tail, walk away, and cut it out.

This is why we call shenanigans like this DSM threads. You always do it. Quit ruining threads.