Ragefire Agreement as of 06/01/2012

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by TheRealHarrisonStill [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Rules lawyering when confronted with indisputable proof, and an admission of guilt, that you are and were exploiting.

Hilarious.

Being banned from the forums 5+ times but continuing to post here. Hilarious

Idiot who doesn't understand English. Hilarious

[Kingofgnomes]

I agree with the Poster that said RF will be almost uncontested in a month. Seems like alot of clerics will get there shot.

[Tanthallas]

"So basically you are saying TMO has no right to defend their position only BDA has that right."

So basically you are trying to argue with yourself now. You can deduce whatever argument you would like, but that is not the one I am making. What I am saying is that TMO is not defending their position, which has yet to be actually addressed in anything but comical and contradictory claims, but instead trolling to confuse the fuck out of people who were not there. Two thirds of the people reading this thread will sympathize with 'sorry, it was a mistake. I did not mean to train you." The other third know damn well that taking the FGs to the ledge or simply DIEING INSTEAD OF TRAINING THE KNOWN BDA AT THE LAIR would have been the obvious choice if the intention was not to 'indirectly' allow for TMO to kill ragefire.

Do you really expect people to believe that the members of TMO run around like fucking chickens with their heads cut off when they 'unexpectedly' have mobs attack them.

Do you really expect people to believe that EXPERIENCED RAIDING GUILD members do not consider the implications of their actions when these actions will affect another raid in the same area? Give me a fucking break man - the only thing on your mind is the other guilds move because it is COMPETITION.

"Simple facts (Ill break it down for those with weak minds) 2 clerics were watching for ragefire. 2 guilds went after ragefire. Guild A offered to roll on that ragefire to be fare. Guild B denied that opportunity and Guild A proceeded to kill Ragefire.

The fact that Guild B's cleric died doesn't even matter."

The fact that Guild B's cleric died, in itself, does not matter. The fact that Guild B's cleric was trained - intentional or not - does. This latter fact was admitted to - but thanks for the res after the fact bro. Nice guys.

"The main concern BDA has seems to be proximity to the mob they are tracking. That is an asinine position if don't be a douche is in order why is tracking from the ledge, the zone in, or anywhere a problem. The rule lawyers are coming from BDA's side this time. BDA is claiming you need to poopsock on the spawn point (and old raid rule). I will counter if you are going to be douche's about it you better have 15 on that spawn point."

I do not think this is what they have been saying at all. Yendor was pretty damn explicit, and so were the 'agreed' upon rules he quoted. Go reread them - that is, if you give two shits. Doubtful.

[arsenalpow]

Originally Posted by Eashan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Let me know the next time you want to do rage fire and I will bring a few toons down there to help make things difficult for TMO.

BDA will pass on your generous offer Eashan.

[Autotune]

Originally Posted by Eashan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Let me know the next time you want to do rage fire and I will bring a few toons down there to help make things difficult for TMO.

i was disappointed this post lacked $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by Tanthallas [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

"So basically you are saying TMO has no right to defend their position only BDA has that right."

So basically you are trying to argue with yourself now. You can deduce whatever argument you would like, but that is not the one I am making. What I am saying is that TMO is not defending their position, which has yet to be actually addressed in anything but comical and contradictory claims, but instead trolling to confuse the fuck out of people who were not there. Two thirds of the people reading this thread will sympathize with 'sorry, it was a mistake. I did not mean to train you." The other third know damn well that taking the FGs to the ledge or simply DIEING INSTEAD OF TRAINING THE KNOWN BDA AT THE LAIR would have been the obvious choice if the intention was not to 'indirectly' allow for TMO to kill ragefire.

Do you really expect people to believe that the members of TMO run around like fucking chickens with their heads cut off when they 'unexpectedly' have mobs attack them.

Do you really expect people to believe that EXPERIENCED RAIDING GUILD members do not consider the implications of their actions when these actions will affect another raid in the same area? Give me a fucking break man - the only thing on your mind is the other guilds move because it is COMPETITION.

"Simple facts (Ill break it down for those with weak minds) 2 clerics were watching for ragefire. 2 guilds went after ragefire. Guild A offered to roll on that ragefire to be fare. Guild B denied that opportunity and Guild A proceeded to kill Ragefire.

The fact that Guild B's cleric died doesn't even matter."

The fact that Guild B's cleric died, in itself, does not matter. The fact that Guild B's cleric was trained - intentional or not - does. This latter fact was admitted to - but thanks for the res after the fact bro. Nice guys.

"The main concern BDA has seems to be proximity to the mob they are tracking. That is an asinine position if don't be a douche is in order why is tracking from the ledge, the zone in, or anywhere a problem. The rule lawyers are coming from BDA's side this time. BDA is claiming you need to poopsock on the spawn point (and old raid rule). I will counter if you are going to be douche's about it you better have 15 on that spawn point."

I do not think this is what they have been saying at all. Yendor was pretty damn explicit, and so were the 'agreed' upon rules he quoted. Go reread them - that is, if you give two shits. Doubtful.

Maybe you should re read them it said if multiple people are camping him roll some dice....which is what TMO decided to do. Case closed super sleuth.

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by TheRealHarrisonStill [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Your welcome!

So your argument is Alarti made a typo therefore exploiting?

A typo, a spelling error, or a grammatical error doesn't demonstrate a lack of understanding. A inability to accept a meaning of a word when used in a sentence does.

What state were you educated in? Were you educated?

[Radiskull]

P99 raiding, where the top guild is and always has been whoever is willing to stoop the lowest.

Congrats for now TMO.

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by TheRealHarrisonStill [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This is just too good.

What I find too good is you can no longer argue your original point so you try to shift to typos. I am a terrible droid typist so feel free to attack my typing skills. TMO doesn't exploit congrats on losing your "argument".

[Autotune]

Harrison only cares about exploits that are used by people he doesn't like. I brought up some other exploits that people probably do daily without even realizing and he was like... so